Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24671 - 24680 of 46960 for show's.
Search results 24671 - 24680 of 46960 for show's.
State v. David S. Frederick
a showing of “sufficient reason” for failing to assert the matter in the original postconviction proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11535 - 2005-03-31
a showing of “sufficient reason” for failing to assert the matter in the original postconviction proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11535 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lance L. Egner
by showing a clear legislative intent that cumulative punishments are not authorized. The defendant must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7160 - 2005-03-31
by showing a clear legislative intent that cumulative punishments are not authorized. The defendant must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7160 - 2005-03-31
State v. Sherry M. Klitzka
, or the probation’s discharge itself. This shows that the trial court had no intention of discharging or changing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13244 - 2005-03-31
, or the probation’s discharge itself. This shows that the trial court had no intention of discharging or changing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13244 - 2005-03-31
Village of Oregon v. Frank P. Sauer
sufficient evidence to permit the trial court to conclude that the Village met its burden to show that Sauer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15748 - 2005-03-31
sufficient evidence to permit the trial court to conclude that the Village met its burden to show that Sauer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15748 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bennie L. Harvey
in appropriate cases, a recess or a continuance. Here, the record shows that the State notified Harvey of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13275 - 2005-03-31
in appropriate cases, a recess or a continuance. Here, the record shows that the State notified Harvey of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13275 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael J. Modrow
N.W.2d 851, 856 (Ct. App. 1989). We will not reverse a discretionary decision if the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10203 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 851, 856 (Ct. App. 1989). We will not reverse a discretionary decision if the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10203 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
its discretion at sentencing. With respect to the entry of the no contest plea, the record shows
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92117 - 2013-01-29
its discretion at sentencing. With respect to the entry of the no contest plea, the record shows
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92117 - 2013-01-29
CA Blank Order
of the no contest plea, the record shows that the circuit court engaged in a colloquy with Buck that satisfied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94809 - 2013-04-02
of the no contest plea, the record shows that the circuit court engaged in a colloquy with Buck that satisfied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94809 - 2013-04-02
Frontsheet
to show cause in writing by March 20, 2008, why the imposition of the identical discipline imposed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33606 - 2008-07-30
to show cause in writing by March 20, 2008, why the imposition of the identical discipline imposed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33606 - 2008-07-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
lack arguable merit. The record shows that the circuit court considered relevant sentencing factors
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209195 - 2018-02-28
lack arguable merit. The record shows that the circuit court considered relevant sentencing factors
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209195 - 2018-02-28