Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24681 - 24690 of 30247 for de.
Search results 24681 - 24690 of 30247 for de.
Michael Mayek v. Cloverleaf Lakes Sanitary District #1
de novo. See Nelson v. McLaughlin, 211 Wis. 2d 487, 495, 565 N.W.2d 123 (1997). The goal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16185 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See Nelson v. McLaughlin, 211 Wis. 2d 487, 495, 565 N.W.2d 123 (1997). The goal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16185 - 2005-03-31
State v. David J. Cleveland
exists in a given case is a question of constitutional law which we review de novo.” Id. We analyze
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16108 - 2005-03-31
exists in a given case is a question of constitutional law which we review de novo.” Id. We analyze
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16108 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael A. DeLain
interpretation of § 940.22(2). Interpretation of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. Johnson
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17911 - 2005-05-02
interpretation of § 940.22(2). Interpretation of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. Johnson
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17911 - 2005-05-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and denying Elnimeiry’s motion to modify child support. ¶20 Elnimeiry timely moved for a de novo hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=773791 - 2024-03-07
and denying Elnimeiry’s motion to modify child support. ¶20 Elnimeiry timely moved for a de novo hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=773791 - 2024-03-07
[PDF]
State v. Deborah E.
the proper legal standard governing termination of parental rights presents a question of law subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4680 - 2017-09-19
the proper legal standard governing termination of parental rights presents a question of law subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4680 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
… presents a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. McGuire, 2010 WI 91, ¶26, 328 Wis. 2d 289
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=890945 - 2024-12-17
… presents a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. McGuire, 2010 WI 91, ¶26, 328 Wis. 2d 289
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=890945 - 2024-12-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, subject to our de novo review.” Smith, 342 Wis. 2d 710, ¶24. When conducting our review, “we consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958882 - 2025-05-20
, subject to our de novo review.” Smith, 342 Wis. 2d 710, ¶24. When conducting our review, “we consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958882 - 2025-05-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the evidence is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210186 - 2018-03-27
of the evidence is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210186 - 2018-03-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the interpretation and application of this statute de novo. State v. Ozuna, 2017 WI 64, ¶9, 376 Wis. 2d 1, 898 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372087 - 2021-06-02
the interpretation and application of this statute de novo. State v. Ozuna, 2017 WI 64, ¶9, 376 Wis. 2d 1, 898 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372087 - 2021-06-02
[PDF]
Mary H. Staehler v. Jennifer L. Beuthin
that the plaintiff’s injuries were de minimis or nonexistent. Id. Here, the jury may well have concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10030 - 2017-09-19
that the plaintiff’s injuries were de minimis or nonexistent. Id. Here, the jury may well have concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10030 - 2017-09-19