Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24681 - 24690 of 32718 for r's.

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - October 2015
the Court of Appeals. This case originated in Rock County Circuit Court, Judge Michael R. Fitzpatrick
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149737 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - October 2010
. The case began in Milwaukee County Circuit Court, Judge Thomas R. Cooper presiding. 09AP1874-AC
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54993 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - April 2011
Bushard v. Steven A. Reisman, et al. 10:45 a.m. 09AP694-CR - State v. Rickey R. Denson 1:30 p.m
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62776 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - March 2021
), that reversed a Milwaukee County Circuit Court decision, Judge Dennis R. Cimpl, presiding, that found James
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346859 - 2021-03-15

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - October 2011
. 09AP2385 - Todd Olson v. Robert Farrar 1:30 p.m. 10AP177 - Suzanne R. May v. Michael T. May
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71714 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - February 2015
. 13AP265 - Mauricio Aguilar v. Husco International, Inc. 1:30 p.m. {13AP1737-CR - State v. Michael R
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134567 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Response of Governor Evers to Consultants' Report
1 STATE OF WISCONSIN I N S U P R E M E C O U R T No. 2023AP1399-OA REBECCA
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0208eversresponse.pdf - 2024-02-08

[PDF] Duane P. Reusch v. Mark W. Roob
authority to support their positions. See Bruntaeger v. Zeller, 515 A.2d 123 (Vt. 1986); R. Bauer & Sons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14710 - 2017-09-21

Jesus Ortega, Jr. v. Gary R. McCaughtry
. Jesus Ortega, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gary R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13125 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to Janet’s letter, Synkelma’s application was denied because, under the Ordinance, “[r]etaining walls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817950 - 2024-06-25