Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24691 - 24700 of 57894 for id.
Search results 24691 - 24700 of 57894 for id.
COURT OF APPEALS
for a new trial unless it erroneously exercised its discretion. See id. at 171. ¶9 Machon first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35015 - 2008-12-29
for a new trial unless it erroneously exercised its discretion. See id. at 171. ¶9 Machon first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35015 - 2008-12-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
makes clear, the information is provided for informational purposes only. See id. 2 Based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1132937 - 2026-06-17
makes clear, the information is provided for informational purposes only. See id. 2 Based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1132937 - 2026-06-17
State v. Earl Steele III
process in determining whether a plea was entered voluntarily, intelligently, and knowingly. Id. at 218
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2174 - 2005-03-31
process in determining whether a plea was entered voluntarily, intelligently, and knowingly. Id. at 218
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2174 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the plea. Id. See also State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 311, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996) (the manifest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82078 - 2014-09-15
the plea. Id. See also State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 311, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996) (the manifest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82078 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and whether money from Denise’s mother was a legal loan. Id. at 2 n.3, 3. The appellate court summarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50547 - 2010-06-13
and whether money from Denise’s mother was a legal loan. Id. at 2 n.3, 3. The appellate court summarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50547 - 2010-06-13
Jesse A. Kaplan v. Arthur Radwill
discretion in denying Kaplan's motion for a new trial.[1] See id. at 408-09, 331 N.W.2d at 593-94
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7950 - 2005-03-31
discretion in denying Kaplan's motion for a new trial.[1] See id. at 408-09, 331 N.W.2d at 593-94
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7950 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John R. Stambaugh
in a revocation of the prior probation. See id. at 87, 423 N.W.2d at 534; see also Beiersdorf, 208 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11922 - 2017-09-21
in a revocation of the prior probation. See id. at 87, 423 N.W.2d at 534; see also Beiersdorf, 208 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11922 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Id. Statutes must be interpreted in context, and reasonably, to avoid absurd results. Id., ¶46
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117398 - 2014-07-21
. Id. Statutes must be interpreted in context, and reasonably, to avoid absurd results. Id., ¶46
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117398 - 2014-07-21
Local 60 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
interpretation will provide uniformity and consistency in the application of the statute. Id. at 284, 548 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12691 - 2005-03-31
interpretation will provide uniformity and consistency in the application of the statute. Id. at 284, 548 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12691 - 2005-03-31
State v. Leon J. Lace
probable cause to arrest, id. at 684. ¶9 Prior to concluding that probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3940 - 2005-03-31
probable cause to arrest, id. at 684. ¶9 Prior to concluding that probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3940 - 2005-03-31