Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2471 - 2480 of 16942 for "48.44" +50.

[PDF] WI 66
the preceding five years, i.e., $697,522. However, because the $697,522 salary was based on Tim working 50
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67825 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - October 3 & 4, 2007
to that award, and (2) Rose’s contention that the trial court erred in splitting the couple’s assets 50/50
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30454 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Response of Johnson Intervenors-Respondents to April 2, 2024 Court Order
of neutrality on its head. In the consultants’ view, to be “neutral,” a map must allow Democrats to get to 50
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0409johnsonintervenorsrespondents.pdf - 2024-04-09

COURT OF APPEALS
the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence.” Id. at 249-50. Discussion ¶14 We understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85394 - 2012-07-25

State v. John Edward Rochon
, 50 Wis.2d 619, 624, 184 N.W. 836, 839 (1971), or, as here, violated § 346.04(3), Stats.[6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14885 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
approach 50 percent” but did not clearly exceed 50 percent. Thus, Dr. Fields opined, to a reasonable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195305 - 2017-09-21

State v. Roger M. Spencer
a reasonable police officer to believe that the defendant probably committed a crime. State v. Paszek, 50 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2483 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Linda Halko v. Lawrence M. Halko
. See Hamilton v. Hamilton, 2003 WI 50, ¶14, 261 Wis. 2d 458, 661 N.W.2d 832. Next, they debate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17632 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
three ways. White said she had taken iPhones, which she sold for $50-100, and iPads, which she sold
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541846 - 2022-07-12

[PDF] CA Blank Order
” and because they “explained [Lutz’s] complaints concerning each of these suits.” Id. at 649-50. We further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817385 - 2024-06-25