Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2471 - 2480 of 83284 for case search.
Search results 2471 - 2480 of 83284 for case search.
State v. Ramon O. Medina-Fuentes
of the Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures. We conclude that the blood draw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5168 - 2005-03-31
of the Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures. We conclude that the blood draw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5168 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was not sufficiently indicative of the presence of drugs to provide probable cause to search the vehicle. Based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983396 - 2025-07-15
was not sufficiently indicative of the presence of drugs to provide probable cause to search the vehicle. Based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983396 - 2025-07-15
[PDF]
State v. Ramon O. Medina-Fuentes
prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures. We conclude that the blood draw was reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5168 - 2017-09-19
prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures. We conclude that the blood draw was reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5168 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was not sufficiently indicative of the presence of drugs to provide probable cause to search the vehicle. Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983396 - 2025-07-15
was not sufficiently indicative of the presence of drugs to provide probable cause to search the vehicle. Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983396 - 2025-07-15
State v. William Staples
. In December 1999, Staples filed a motion to suppress evidence, arguing that the search of the “utility case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2697 - 2005-03-31
. In December 1999, Staples filed a motion to suppress evidence, arguing that the search of the “utility case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2697 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. William Staples
a motion to suppress evidence, arguing that the search of the “utility case” and the search of his person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2697 - 2017-09-19
a motion to suppress evidence, arguing that the search of the “utility case” and the search of his person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2697 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - September 2009
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT CALENDAR AND CASE SYNOPSES September 2009 This calendar
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40661 - 2014-09-15
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT CALENDAR AND CASE SYNOPSES September 2009 This calendar
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40661 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief. Thillemann argues law enforcement involuntarily obtained his consent to search his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=738081 - 2023-12-13
for postconviction relief. Thillemann argues law enforcement involuntarily obtained his consent to search his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=738081 - 2023-12-13
State v. Craig Shelton Hayes
search.” This court agrees and therefore reverses. The facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13234 - 2005-03-31
search.” This court agrees and therefore reverses. The facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13234 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Craig Shelton Hayes
the pat-down search.” This court agrees and therefore reverses. The facts of record are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13234 - 2017-09-21
the pat-down search.” This court agrees and therefore reverses. The facts of record are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13234 - 2017-09-21