Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2471 - 2480 of 6253 for cf.
Search results 2471 - 2480 of 6253 for cf.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the officers who interrogated Harris. Cf. State v. Jimmie R.R., 2000 WI App 5, ¶39, 232 Wis. 2d 138, 606 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=726452 - 2023-11-15
of the officers who interrogated Harris. Cf. State v. Jimmie R.R., 2000 WI App 5, ¶39, 232 Wis. 2d 138, 606 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=726452 - 2023-11-15
[PDF]
State v. Donald J. Draves
has the burden to prove all elements of a crime and to negate defenses. Cf. id. at 594, 493 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10720 - 2017-09-20
has the burden to prove all elements of a crime and to negate defenses. Cf. id. at 594, 493 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10720 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
without stating any reasons for doing so[.]”); cf. WIS. STAT. § 751.10 (“The supreme court shall decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78581 - 2014-09-15
without stating any reasons for doing so[.]”); cf. WIS. STAT. § 751.10 (“The supreme court shall decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78581 - 2014-09-15
State v. Harold C. Mikkelson
and Rule 809.62. Appeal No. 01-2207 Cir. Ct. No. 00-CF-159 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4312 - 2005-03-31
and Rule 809.62. Appeal No. 01-2207 Cir. Ct. No. 00-CF-159 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4312 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
did not deny ownership. Cf. Black, 238 Wis. 2d 203, ¶17 (officer who noticed “bulging pockets
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193660 - 2017-09-21
did not deny ownership. Cf. Black, 238 Wis. 2d 203, ¶17 (officer who noticed “bulging pockets
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193660 - 2017-09-21
State v. Maurice A. Fields
. Appeal No. 01-3236-CR Cir. Ct. No. 99-CF-134 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4653 - 2005-03-31
. Appeal No. 01-3236-CR Cir. Ct. No. 99-CF-134 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4653 - 2005-03-31
State v. James Jagodinsky
appellate review. Cf. Purkett v. Elem, 514 U.S. ___, 115 S. Ct. 1769, 1775 (1995) (per curiam) (Stevens, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11555 - 2005-03-31
appellate review. Cf. Purkett v. Elem, 514 U.S. ___, 115 S. Ct. 1769, 1775 (1995) (per curiam) (Stevens, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11555 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to was State v. Jose L. Perez Lemus, Waukesha County Case No. 11-CF-103. There, Perez Lemus was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107796 - 2014-02-11
to was State v. Jose L. Perez Lemus, Waukesha County Case No. 11-CF-103. There, Perez Lemus was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107796 - 2014-02-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that a prosecutor’s conduct constitutes “overreaching,” however, present issues subject to our de novo review. Cf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=684551 - 2023-08-02
that a prosecutor’s conduct constitutes “overreaching,” however, present issues subject to our de novo review. Cf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=684551 - 2023-08-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
time that could taint the proceedings. Cf. id. at 588-89. Rebecca and Craig have not argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106959 - 2017-09-21
time that could taint the proceedings. Cf. id. at 588-89. Rebecca and Craig have not argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106959 - 2017-09-21