Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2471 - 2480 of 29823 for des.
Search results 2471 - 2480 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
County of Waukesha v. Laura J. M.
. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2005AP755 2 ¶1 SNYDER, J. 1 Laura J.M. appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19177 - 2017-09-21
. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2005AP755 2 ¶1 SNYDER, J. 1 Laura J.M. appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19177 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Michael F. Lanois v. Eye Communication Systems, Inc.
, 576 N.W.2d 56 (Ct. App. 1997). We review the circuit court’s decision to grant summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19800 - 2017-09-21
, 576 N.W.2d 56 (Ct. App. 1997). We review the circuit court’s decision to grant summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19800 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel. Sufficiency of the motion is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Allen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158237 - 2017-09-21
counsel. Sufficiency of the motion is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Allen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158237 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
City of Kenosha v. Ralph C. Leese
a jury trial. We review de novo Leese’s challenge to the constitutionality of § 800.14. See Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14179 - 2014-09-15
a jury trial. We review de novo Leese’s challenge to the constitutionality of § 800.14. See Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14179 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at trial about Johnson’s guilt. Our review is de novo. See State v. Corey J.G., 215 Wis. 2d 395, 405
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64240 - 2014-09-15
at trial about Johnson’s guilt. Our review is de novo. See State v. Corey J.G., 215 Wis. 2d 395, 405
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64240 - 2014-09-15
State v. John R. Lootans
the matter de novo without deference to the trial court. See id. Probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12333 - 2005-03-31
the matter de novo without deference to the trial court. See id. Probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12333 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
principles to the findings of fact de novo.” State v. Smiter, 2011 WI App 15, ¶9, 331 Wis. 2d 431, 793 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894743 - 2024-12-26
principles to the findings of fact de novo.” State v. Smiter, 2011 WI App 15, ¶9, 331 Wis. 2d 431, 793 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894743 - 2024-12-26
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. State v. Reed, 2005 WI 53, ¶11, 280 Wis. 2d 68, 695 N.W.2d 315. This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85627 - 2012-07-31
that we review de novo. State v. Reed, 2005 WI 53, ¶11, 280 Wis. 2d 68, 695 N.W.2d 315. This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85627 - 2012-07-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
information at sentencing.” State v. Coffee, 2020 WI 1, ¶38, 389 Wis. 2d 627, 937 N.W.2d 579. We review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993507 - 2025-08-07
information at sentencing.” State v. Coffee, 2020 WI 1, ¶38, 389 Wis. 2d 627, 937 N.W.2d 579. We review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993507 - 2025-08-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and application of statutes de novo. See Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. LIRC, 2018 WI 76, ¶29, 382 Wis. 2d 624, 914
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640653 - 2023-04-04
and application of statutes de novo. See Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. LIRC, 2018 WI 76, ¶29, 382 Wis. 2d 624, 914
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640653 - 2023-04-04