Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2471 - 2480 of 29823 for des.
Search results 2471 - 2480 of 29823 for des.
2010 WI APP 50
judgment de novo and independently of the circuit court, but we apply the same methodology and benefit from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46960 - 2010-04-25
judgment de novo and independently of the circuit court, but we apply the same methodology and benefit from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46960 - 2010-04-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶30. ¶7 Under WIS. STAT. § 971.12(1), crimes may be charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909669 - 2025-02-05
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶30. ¶7 Under WIS. STAT. § 971.12(1), crimes may be charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909669 - 2025-02-05
[PDF]
State v. Stanley Hess
was voluntarily and intelligently entered is a question of constitutional fact which this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10591 - 2017-09-20
was voluntarily and intelligently entered is a question of constitutional fact which this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10591 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of counsel’s effectiveness is a question of law that is reviewed de novo by this court. Kimbrough, 246 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211869 - 2018-04-26
of counsel’s effectiveness is a question of law that is reviewed de novo by this court. Kimbrough, 246 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211869 - 2018-04-26
[PDF]
County of Waukesha v. Laura J. M.
. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2005AP755 2 ¶1 SNYDER, J. 1 Laura J.M. appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19177 - 2017-09-21
. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2005AP755 2 ¶1 SNYDER, J. 1 Laura J.M. appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19177 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Michael F. Lanois v. Eye Communication Systems, Inc.
, 576 N.W.2d 56 (Ct. App. 1997). We review the circuit court’s decision to grant summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19800 - 2017-09-21
, 576 N.W.2d 56 (Ct. App. 1997). We review the circuit court’s decision to grant summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19800 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel. Sufficiency of the motion is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Allen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158237 - 2017-09-21
counsel. Sufficiency of the motion is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Allen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158237 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
City of Kenosha v. Ralph C. Leese
a jury trial. We review de novo Leese’s challenge to the constitutionality of § 800.14. See Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14179 - 2014-09-15
a jury trial. We review de novo Leese’s challenge to the constitutionality of § 800.14. See Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14179 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at trial about Johnson’s guilt. Our review is de novo. See State v. Corey J.G., 215 Wis. 2d 395, 405
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64240 - 2014-09-15
at trial about Johnson’s guilt. Our review is de novo. See State v. Corey J.G., 215 Wis. 2d 395, 405
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64240 - 2014-09-15
State v. John R. Lootans
the matter de novo without deference to the trial court. See id. Probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12333 - 2005-03-31
the matter de novo without deference to the trial court. See id. Probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12333 - 2005-03-31