Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2471 - 2480 of 68502 for did.
Search results 2471 - 2480 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1 The circuit court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in declining
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=392940 - 2021-07-21
. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1 The circuit court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in declining
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=392940 - 2021-07-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael C. Cull
before he allegedly received this incorrect information. Because this court concludes that Cull did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13225 - 2017-09-21
before he allegedly received this incorrect information. Because this court concludes that Cull did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13225 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the verdicts; the State did not oppose the motion. The State then filed an amended information charging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=318262 - 2020-12-29
the verdicts; the State did not oppose the motion. The State then filed an amended information charging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=318262 - 2020-12-29
COURT OF APPEALS
that she did abandon the children. See Wis. Stat. § 48.422(7). ¶3 Before accepting a person’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32404 - 2008-04-14
that she did abandon the children. See Wis. Stat. § 48.422(7). ¶3 Before accepting a person’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32404 - 2008-04-14
Shirley Y. Godiwalla, M.D. v. State of WI Medical Examining Bd.
that the Board did not cite substantial evidence in support of its finding that she did not meet the minimum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24985 - 2006-05-02
that the Board did not cite substantial evidence in support of its finding that she did not meet the minimum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24985 - 2006-05-02
[PDF]
WI App 20
, sitting in its role as the sentencing court, did not have competency to address Williams’ motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208217 - 2018-04-09
, sitting in its role as the sentencing court, did not have competency to address Williams’ motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208217 - 2018-04-09
[PDF]
State v. Calvin Morrison
did not understand the advantages of retaining counsel or the difficulties of proceeding pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10996 - 2017-09-19
did not understand the advantages of retaining counsel or the difficulties of proceeding pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10996 - 2017-09-19
State v. Christopher B. Cook
the vehicle and parked. ¶7 Officer Pitt testified that he did not activate his lights or siren
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4351 - 2005-03-31
the vehicle and parked. ¶7 Officer Pitt testified that he did not activate his lights or siren
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4351 - 2005-03-31
State v. Calvin Morrison
requires a new trial because he did not understand the advantages of retaining counsel or the difficulties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10996 - 2005-03-31
requires a new trial because he did not understand the advantages of retaining counsel or the difficulties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10996 - 2005-03-31
Kenneth W. Rupena v. Palmer Johnson of Racine, Inc.
. That was not the basis of the trial court’s decision, and therefore, the court did not make appropriate findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4607 - 2005-03-31
. That was not the basis of the trial court’s decision, and therefore, the court did not make appropriate findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4607 - 2005-03-31