Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2471 - 2480 of 70126 for his.
Search results 2471 - 2480 of 70126 for his.
[PDF]
State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
judgments convicting him of four felonies and two misdemeanors and orders denying his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9586 - 2017-09-19
judgments convicting him of four felonies and two misdemeanors and orders denying his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9586 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
and orders denying his postconviction motions. He argues that his trial attorneys were ineffective because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9589 - 2005-03-31
and orders denying his postconviction motions. He argues that his trial attorneys were ineffective because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9589 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Kind appeals from a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. He seeks
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252929 - 2020-01-29
. Kind appeals from a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. He seeks
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252929 - 2020-01-29
[PDF]
State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
judgments convicting him of four felonies and two misdemeanors and orders denying his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9588 - 2017-09-19
judgments convicting him of four felonies and two misdemeanors and orders denying his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9588 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
and orders denying his postconviction motions. He argues that his trial attorneys were ineffective because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9586 - 2005-03-31
and orders denying his postconviction motions. He argues that his trial attorneys were ineffective because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9586 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
and orders denying his postconviction motions. He argues that his trial attorneys were ineffective because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9587 - 2005-03-31
and orders denying his postconviction motions. He argues that his trial attorneys were ineffective because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9587 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that the trial court erred in two respects. First, the State argues that Xiong was not “in custody” during his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35419 - 2009-04-20
that the trial court erred in two respects. First, the State argues that Xiong was not “in custody” during his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35419 - 2009-04-20
[PDF]
State v. Paul D. Hoppe
. Hoppe’s speech was slurred and he was shaking so badly he was not able to walk on his own. The officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2802 - 2017-09-19
. Hoppe’s speech was slurred and he was shaking so badly he was not able to walk on his own. The officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2802 - 2017-09-19
State v. Paul D. Hoppe
was slurred and he was shaking so badly he was not able to walk on his own. The officers had to physically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2802 - 2005-03-31
was slurred and he was shaking so badly he was not able to walk on his own. The officers had to physically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2802 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the trial court erred in two respects. First, the State argues that Xiong was not “in custody” during his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35419 - 2014-09-15
that the trial court erred in two respects. First, the State argues that Xiong was not “in custody” during his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35419 - 2014-09-15