Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2471 - 2480 of 20302 for sai.
Search results 2471 - 2480 of 20302 for sai.
[PDF]
State v. Martin M. Dudek
to any tests. Trooper Paine then says here is a phone—here is your phone. Call him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26240 - 2017-09-21
to any tests. Trooper Paine then says here is a phone—here is your phone. Call him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26240 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Rohini Avvaru v. Gerald D. O'Marro
to say this was “excusable neglect.” I don’t see it as being “excusable neglect.” Maybe if I took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11023 - 2017-09-19
to say this was “excusable neglect.” I don’t see it as being “excusable neglect.” Maybe if I took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11023 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jose R.
to answer any questions and would not say a word.” Further, Jose R. admitted to knowing from “cop shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19172 - 2017-09-21
to answer any questions and would not say a word.” Further, Jose R. admitted to knowing from “cop shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19172 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that would justify [the search]. You could say it’s the automobile exception, you could say it’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840012 - 2024-08-21
that would justify [the search]. You could say it’s the automobile exception, you could say it’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840012 - 2024-08-21
Lisa R. Steeno v. Joseph L. Steeno
significant with respect to what it does not say than what it does say. Joseph claims the parties crafted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6750 - 2005-03-31
significant with respect to what it does not say than what it does say. Joseph claims the parties crafted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6750 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jose R.
at the suppression hearing in this case, “refused to answer any questions and would not say a word.” Further, Jose R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19172 - 2005-08-01
at the suppression hearing in this case, “refused to answer any questions and would not say a word.” Further, Jose R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19172 - 2005-08-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
as to what would happen if she told a lie. However, she did say that a lie was a bad thing, and throughout
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44495 - 2014-09-15
as to what would happen if she told a lie. However, she did say that a lie was a bad thing, and throughout
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44495 - 2014-09-15
State v. Martin M. Dudek
attorney told him that he should never submit to any tests. Trooper Paine then says here is a phone—here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26240 - 2006-08-22
attorney told him that he should never submit to any tests. Trooper Paine then says here is a phone—here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26240 - 2006-08-22
State v. Luis Vasquez
other people as to what they say they heard Berrisford say.” The court observed, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3886 - 2005-03-31
other people as to what they say they heard Berrisford say.” The court observed, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3886 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
or asked her” or indicated “she was aware of what we were saying [or whether she knew us].” Margaret’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48630 - 2010-04-05
or asked her” or indicated “she was aware of what we were saying [or whether she knew us].” Margaret’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48630 - 2010-04-05