Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2471 - 2480 of 46939 for show's.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
had new evidence that showed that Estate of Dorothy Matteson, c/o Zacherl, O’Malley & Endejan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184763 - 2017-09-21

State v. Joshua J. Alderman
. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). To prove deficient performance, a defendant must show specific acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20459 - 2005-11-30

Pastori M. Balele v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
, that Balele failed to show: (1) that he was qualified for the position, (2) that Balele failed to present any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4129 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
showing that she was denied the right to counsel. We reverse. ¶2 In January 2008 while on extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43959 - 2009-12-01

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 8, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
. 668, 687 (1984). To prove deficient performance, a defendant must show specific acts or omissions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28353 - 2011-07-19

[PDF] WI 9
an order directing Attorney Neuendorf to show cause, in writing, why the court should not impose
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27894 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
was not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered. Id., ¶6. The defendant must make a prima facie showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56489 - 2010-11-09

COURT OF APPEALS
, the court erred by finding Lopez failed to show a substantial change in circumstances. We reject Lopez’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73910 - 2011-11-14

[PDF] WI 7
an appeal (Count 1). The referee also concluded the evidence was insufficient to show Attorney Batt
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46692 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Alfonzo P. Taylor
claim, the defendant must show both deficient performance and prejudice. Strickland v. Washington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20303 - 2017-09-21