Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24701 - 24710 of 29823 for des.
Search results 24701 - 24710 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Grant County: Robert P. van de hey, Judge. Appeal dismissed in part; order reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92280 - 2013-01-30
of the circuit court for Grant County: Robert P. van de hey, Judge. Appeal dismissed in part; order reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92280 - 2013-01-30
State v. Joseph A. Lombard
). Statutory interpretation is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Williams, 198 Wis. 2d 516
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16452 - 2005-03-31
). Statutory interpretation is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Williams, 198 Wis. 2d 516
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16452 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo." Schmidt v. N. States Power Co., 2007 WI 136, ¶24, 305 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37442 - 2009-07-08
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo." Schmidt v. N. States Power Co., 2007 WI 136, ¶24, 305 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37442 - 2009-07-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
ruling permitting him to testify is subject to our de novo review because, according to ATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=726795 - 2023-11-09
ruling permitting him to testify is subject to our de novo review because, according to ATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=726795 - 2023-11-09
[PDF]
WI APP 20
great weight deference, due weight deference, or de novo review. Caterpillar, Inc., 241 Wis. 2d 282
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27920 - 2014-09-15
great weight deference, due weight deference, or de novo review. Caterpillar, Inc., 241 Wis. 2d 282
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27920 - 2014-09-15
State v. Antwan B. Manuel
of law we review de novo. State v. Weed, 2003 WI 85, ¶10, 263 Wis. 2d 434, 666 N.W.2d 485.[4] ¶26
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18534 - 2005-06-09
of law we review de novo. State v. Weed, 2003 WI 85, ¶10, 263 Wis. 2d 434, 666 N.W.2d 485.[4] ¶26
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18534 - 2005-06-09
[PDF]
Roy S. Thorp v. Town of Lebanon
is a question of law," which we review de novo. DNR v. City of Waukesha, 184 Wis. 2d 178, 189, 515 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17421 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law," which we review de novo. DNR v. City of Waukesha, 184 Wis. 2d 178, 189, 515 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17421 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 98
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo." E-L Enters. v. Milwaukee Metro. Sewerage Dist., 2010
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84983 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo." E-L Enters. v. Milwaukee Metro. Sewerage Dist., 2010
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84983 - 2014-09-15
Wausau Tile, Inc. v. County Concrete Corporation
this court reviews de novo. Daanen & Janssen, Inc. v. Cedarapids, Inc., 216 Wis. 2d 395, 400, 573 N.W.2d 842
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17293 - 2005-03-31
this court reviews de novo. Daanen & Janssen, Inc. v. Cedarapids, Inc., 216 Wis. 2d 395, 400, 573 N.W.2d 842
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17293 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 31
for his misconduct, namely his imprisonment for 10 months, which the referee viewed as a “de facto
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977961 - 2025-07-01
for his misconduct, namely his imprisonment for 10 months, which the referee viewed as a “de facto
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977961 - 2025-07-01