Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24721 - 24730 of 56214 for n y c.

[PDF] State v. John F. Powers
. STAT. § 940.225(2)(g) made it a Class BC (now Class C) felony for “an employee of a facility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6563 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Frontsheet
: By converting T.A.'s funds to his own use or benefit, Attorney Vaitys violated SCR 20:8.4(c).7 Count Four
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245557 - 2019-08-28

Carl Kaminski v. David H. Schwarz
by William C. Wolford, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs was James E. Doyle, attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17568 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
conclude Love misreads Hogan, and its quote from Dobbs. Hogan, 397 Wis. 2d 171, ¶27 n.8; Dobbs, 392
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1042037 - 2025-11-25

[PDF] NOTICE
in a civil trial”), and State v. Joe C., 186 Wis. 2d 580, 585, 522 N.W.2d 222 (Ct. App. 1994) (recognizing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57879 - 2014-09-15

State v. William Koller
and orders of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: LAURENCE C. GRAM, WILLIAM D. GARDNER AND JOHN J. DI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16241 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] City of Oak Creek v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
by the commission, in the fixation of rates, of such consequent increase of cost of service. (c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24499 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Fun-World 2, L.L.C. v. Joseph Konopka
, Class C licenses, you know, stuff like that. … I was trained by, I felt, some of the best in the world
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5815 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. William Koller
judgments and orders of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: LAURENCE C. GRAM, WILLIAM D. GARDNER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16241 - 2017-09-21

City of Oak Creek v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
of a statute should not be chosen over the agency’s interpretation.” UFE Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis. 2d 274, 287 n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24499 - 2006-05-30