Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24731 - 24740 of 30059 for de.
Search results 24731 - 24740 of 30059 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Gabriel Derango
bindover decision is de novo. See State v. Moats, 156 Wis.2d 74, 84, 457 N.W.2d 299, 304 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13705 - 2014-09-15
bindover decision is de novo. See State v. Moats, 156 Wis.2d 74, 84, 457 N.W.2d 299, 304 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13705 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of historical fact unless they are clearly erroneous and examining de novo its application of those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33023 - 2008-06-16
of historical fact unless they are clearly erroneous and examining de novo its application of those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33023 - 2008-06-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
ruling permitting him to testify is subject to our de novo review because, according to ATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=726795 - 2023-11-09
ruling permitting him to testify is subject to our de novo review because, according to ATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=726795 - 2023-11-09
[PDF]
Leanne M. Abbas v. Bradley J. Palmersheim
We disagree. ¶17 The question before us is one of statutory interpretation, which we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6001 - 2017-09-19
We disagree. ¶17 The question before us is one of statutory interpretation, which we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6001 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
mootness and procedural due process present questions of law we review de novo. Marathon County v. D.K
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=536629 - 2022-06-23
mootness and procedural due process present questions of law we review de novo. Marathon County v. D.K
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=536629 - 2022-06-23
[PDF]
Frontsheet
of law that we review de novo. State v. Stuart (Stuart I), 2003 WI 73, ¶20, 262 Wis. 2d 620, 664 N.W
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347890 - 2021-05-28
of law that we review de novo. State v. Stuart (Stuart I), 2003 WI 73, ¶20, 262 Wis. 2d 620, 664 N.W
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347890 - 2021-05-28
[PDF]
WI App 33
2021 WI App 33 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2020AP285 Comp...
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=359026 - 2021-06-14
2021 WI App 33 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2020AP285 Comp...
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=359026 - 2021-06-14
[PDF]
Jim Hilton v. Department of Natural Resources
that the determinations of the ALJ should be reviewed de novo, because the DNR failed to employ its expertise
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25788 - 2017-09-21
that the determinations of the ALJ should be reviewed de novo, because the DNR failed to employ its expertise
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25788 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James H. Oswald
. The trial court’s decision whether the waiver was valid is reviewed de novo because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12698 - 2017-09-21
. The trial court’s decision whether the waiver was valid is reviewed de novo because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12698 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Stevens, 171 Wis. 2d 106, 111-12, 490 N.W.2d 753 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48654 - 2010-04-05
is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Stevens, 171 Wis. 2d 106, 111-12, 490 N.W.2d 753 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48654 - 2010-04-05