Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24731 - 24740 of 29996 for de.
Search results 24731 - 24740 of 29996 for de.
Lesley Thomas v. Michael J. Bickler
subject to our de novo review. Wisconsin Cent. Ltd. v. DOR, 2000 WI App 14, ¶9, 232 Wis. 2d 323, 606 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4229 - 2005-03-31
subject to our de novo review. Wisconsin Cent. Ltd. v. DOR, 2000 WI App 14, ¶9, 232 Wis. 2d 323, 606 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4229 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 29
uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108162 - 2017-09-21
uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108162 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990). A court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191253 - 2017-09-21
of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990). A court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191253 - 2017-09-21
Jennifer Switzer v. Jonathan C. Switzer
interpretation are questions of law subject to our de novo review. Hayen v. Hayen, 2000 WI App 29, ¶6, 232 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20739 - 2006-01-24
interpretation are questions of law subject to our de novo review. Hayen v. Hayen, 2000 WI App 29, ¶6, 232 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20739 - 2006-01-24
State v. Larry D. Benoit
the objection. The error, if any, was de minimis and therefore harmless. State v. Dyess, 124 Wis.2d 525, 540
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7853 - 2005-03-31
the objection. The error, if any, was de minimis and therefore harmless. State v. Dyess, 124 Wis.2d 525, 540
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7853 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law de novo. Id. ¶34 We conclude that the post-conviction court correctly determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213239 - 2018-07-12
of law de novo. Id. ¶34 We conclude that the post-conviction court correctly determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213239 - 2018-07-12
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy D. Russ
the burden of proof presents a question of law for our de novo review. Long v. Ardestani, 2001 WI App 46
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20692 - 2017-09-21
the burden of proof presents a question of law for our de novo review. Long v. Ardestani, 2001 WI App 46
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20692 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Leonard T. Collins
and 973.12. Statutory interpretation is an issue of law that we review de novo. State v. Campbell, 2002
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4299 - 2017-09-19
and 973.12. Statutory interpretation is an issue of law that we review de novo. State v. Campbell, 2002
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4299 - 2017-09-19
Gerald Trott v. Wisconsin Department of Health & Family Services
the interpretation of a statute, is a question of law that we review de novo.” Hillhaven Corp. v. DHFS, 232 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2656 - 2005-03-31
the interpretation of a statute, is a question of law that we review de novo.” Hillhaven Corp. v. DHFS, 232 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2656 - 2005-03-31
WI App 148 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP225 Complete Title of...
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104462 - 2013-12-17
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104462 - 2013-12-17