Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24731 - 24740 of 46938 for shows.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. The record shows that the court engaged in a thorough colloquy satisfying the requirements of State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102127 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
as an erroneous exercise of discretion on the ground that it was unduly harsh must show that the sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109066 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
“with the presumption that the [circuit] court acted reasonably, and the defendant must show some unreasonable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=478690 - 2022-02-03

[PDF] Village of Oregon v. Frank P. Sauer
that the Village met its burden to show that Sauer was guilty of OMVWI. In its decision at the conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15748 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Jimmy Bridges v. Gerald Berge
not otherwise explain this conclusion. As far as the appellate record shows, no briefing or argument from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2761 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Oliver A. Pentinmaki, Jr. v. Mary C. Volker
. Pentinmaki did not allege, nor do the facts of record show, that any additional legal proceedings resulted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7769 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 2, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
home occupation” permit must show that his or her proposed use complies with Columbia County Ordinance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26992 - 2006-11-01

[PDF] State v. Raul R. Rodriguez
points to nothing in the record showing the actual reason in this case for the prosecutorial decisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26605 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Lawrence Leon Ratliff, Jr.
are to the 2003-04 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2004AP1210-CR 3 of whether the facts show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18578 - 2017-09-21

State v. Michael Modrow
N.W.2d 851, 856 (Ct. App. 1989). We will not reverse a discretionary decision if the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10220 - 2005-03-31