Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24731 - 24740 of 82944 for simple case search.
Search results 24731 - 24740 of 82944 for simple case search.
State v. John L. Griffin
was prohibited by § 973.12(1), Stats., and cases decided thereunder. The statute provides as follows: Whenever
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11542 - 2005-03-31
was prohibited by § 973.12(1), Stats., and cases decided thereunder. The statute provides as follows: Whenever
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11542 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the nature of this case, this court, on its own motion, has amended the caption to shield the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91922 - 2014-09-15
of the nature of this case, this court, on its own motion, has amended the caption to shield the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91922 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS
2012 COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92875 - 2014-09-15
2012 COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92875 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Anthony J. Dentici
) (1997–98), which provided for six-person juries in misdemeanor cases, might be held unconstitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16070 - 2017-09-21
) (1997–98), which provided for six-person juries in misdemeanor cases, might be held unconstitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16070 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the criminal complaint filed in Milwaukee County case No. 2015CF74, which underlies appeal No. 2016AP1169
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218892 - 2018-09-07
to the criminal complaint filed in Milwaukee County case No. 2015CF74, which underlies appeal No. 2016AP1169
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218892 - 2018-09-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217472 - 2018-08-15
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217472 - 2018-08-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242870 - 2019-06-25
conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242870 - 2019-06-25
[PDF]
State v. Gary Curtis
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2884-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11531 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2884-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11531 - 2017-09-19
State v. Frankie L. Taylor
with the case as a result of undue delay in filing the complaint; (2) his due process rights were violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11028 - 2005-03-31
with the case as a result of undue delay in filing the complaint; (2) his due process rights were violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11028 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Manuel Sergio Martinez
in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), and could not be used by the State in its case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18201 - 2017-09-21
in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), and could not be used by the State in its case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18201 - 2017-09-21