Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24751 - 24760 of 59320 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 24751 - 24760 of 59320 for SMALL CLAIMS.
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction plea-withdrawal motion, her claims against successor trial counsel and standby counsel, and her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29262 - 2007-06-04
postconviction plea-withdrawal motion, her claims against successor trial counsel and standby counsel, and her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29262 - 2007-06-04
[PDF]
State v. Harry L. Gant
an inadequate showing on one. Id. at 697. We address each of Gant’s claims regarding his counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5963 - 2017-09-19
an inadequate showing on one. Id. at 697. We address each of Gant’s claims regarding his counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5963 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from Fast Park the following day. ¶7 As of November 5, Fast Park continued to claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150281 - 2017-09-21
from Fast Park the following day. ¶7 As of November 5, Fast Park continued to claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150281 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on his claim. Again, the court denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing after concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87609 - 2014-09-15
on his claim. Again, the court denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing after concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87609 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey Benes
. Affirmed. Before Brown, P.J., Nettesheim and Anderson, JJ. BROWN, P.J. Jeffrey Benes claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14770 - 2017-09-21
. Affirmed. Before Brown, P.J., Nettesheim and Anderson, JJ. BROWN, P.J. Jeffrey Benes claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14770 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Wisconsin’s restitution law. The trial court observed that Brown’s claim that he was acting in self-defense
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=685266 - 2023-08-01
Wisconsin’s restitution law. The trial court observed that Brown’s claim that he was acting in self-defense
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=685266 - 2023-08-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the gravity of the offense and its effect on the victim, we reject his claims and affirm. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209127 - 2018-03-06
of the gravity of the offense and its effect on the victim, we reject his claims and affirm. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209127 - 2018-03-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
them further. The no-merit report also discusses whether there is arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632052 - 2023-03-15
them further. The no-merit report also discusses whether there is arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632052 - 2023-03-15
Conrad L. Aichele and Amanda L. Aichele v. Clark County
the County from claiming a three-week grace period from liability under Wis. Stat. § 81.15 (1997-98).[1] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15973 - 2005-03-31
the County from claiming a three-week grace period from liability under Wis. Stat. § 81.15 (1997-98).[1] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15973 - 2005-03-31
Russell W. Weber v. Terrence M. Crossin
and was in need of replacement. The Webers subsequently initiated this action against the Crossins, claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15503 - 2005-03-31
and was in need of replacement. The Webers subsequently initiated this action against the Crossins, claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15503 - 2005-03-31