Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24751 - 24760 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 24751 - 24760 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
dismissed Brefka’s appeal and remanded the case back to the municipal court for disposition. Brefka
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83708 - 2012-06-18
dismissed Brefka’s appeal and remanded the case back to the municipal court for disposition. Brefka
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83708 - 2012-06-18
COURT OF APPEALS
underlying this case, as well as charges resulting from an unrelated case for domestic disturbance, Darden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81988 - 2012-05-02
underlying this case, as well as charges resulting from an unrelated case for domestic disturbance, Darden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81988 - 2012-05-02
[PDF]
Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic
.................................... 6 Challenge 5: Maintaining Case Processing and Continuing Jury Trials
/publications/reports/docs/covidlessons.pdf - 2022-03-10
.................................... 6 Challenge 5: Maintaining Case Processing and Continuing Jury Trials
/publications/reports/docs/covidlessons.pdf - 2022-03-10
State v. Arthur Beiersdorf
PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9013 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9013 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Alphonsus (Al) Mitchell v. Richard Sherman
. The following issues are dispositive of this appeal: (1) whether the law of the case requires Mitchell's claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9638 - 2017-09-19
. The following issues are dispositive of this appeal: (1) whether the law of the case requires Mitchell's claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9638 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
to the bankruptcy filings. However, the dismissal order stated, “This case may be reopened upon notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93547 - 2013-03-04
to the bankruptcy filings. However, the dismissal order stated, “This case may be reopened upon notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93547 - 2013-03-04
2006 WI APP 211
2006 WI App 211 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP2074
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26547 - 2006-10-30
2006 WI App 211 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP2074
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26547 - 2006-10-30
State v. Arthur Beiersdorf
PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9012 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9012 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Kathryn Belich v. Steven Szymaszek
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-3447 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13314 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-3447 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13314 - 2017-09-21
State v. Kenneth Dwight Spaulding
) that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. The cases, all tried together, were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16322 - 2005-03-31
) that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. The cases, all tried together, were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16322 - 2005-03-31