Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24761 - 24770 of 59312 for quit claim deed.

Dorothy L. Ostovich v. Robert Sanderson
Sanderson appeals from a small claims judgment in favor of his former tenant, Dorothy L. Ostovich
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13565 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
by failing to place him in SAP immediately upon serving his presumptive minimum sentence. Erb claimed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919693 - 2025-02-25

[PDF] Nicholas R. Ball v. Cooperative Educational Service Agency No. 6
it specifically in its answer. CESA’s answer did not specifically claim immunity under § 893.80(4), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11459 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] _WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167937 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
by reason of mental disease or defect (NGI), as he claimed to have no memory of the shooting due to head
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=642353 - 2023-04-11

COURT OF APPEALS
record made postconviction on defendant’s claim that the plea was not properly entered. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48616 - 2010-04-06

[PDF] Dorothy L. Ostovich v. Robert Sanderson
. NETTESHEIM, J. Robert Sanderson appeals from a small claims judgment in favor of his former tenant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13565 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. VanCaster told its author that he believed “the psychologist screwed me.” VanCaster claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204727 - 2017-12-12

John Maniaci v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
, 241 (Ct. App. 1995). Maniaci first claims that his employer’s Substance Abuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11118 - 2005-03-31

Ben Breister v. Valley Bakers Coop Assn.
decision denying his claim for worker’s compensation benefits pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 102.35(3).[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6902 - 2005-03-31