Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24771 - 24780 of 29996 for de.
Search results 24771 - 24780 of 29996 for de.
[PDF]
Randie Rowell v. Aldred Ash
reviews the record de novo. Jacque v. Steenberg Homes, Inc., 209 Wis.2d 605, 614, 563 N.W.2d 154, 158
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14609 - 2017-09-21
reviews the record de novo. Jacque v. Steenberg Homes, Inc., 209 Wis.2d 605, 614, 563 N.W.2d 154, 158
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14609 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Lori B. v. Steven B.
. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Setagord, 211 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14663 - 2017-09-21
. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Setagord, 211 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14663 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law for this court’s de novo review. See State v. Dodson, 219 Wis. 2d 65, 69-70, 580 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010519 - 2025-09-16
is a question of law for this court’s de novo review. See State v. Dodson, 219 Wis. 2d 65, 69-70, 580 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010519 - 2025-09-16
[PDF]
State v. James F. Brienzo
as a child is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Jensen, 2000 WI 84, ¶12, 236 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3986 - 2017-09-20
as a child is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Jensen, 2000 WI 84, ¶12, 236 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3986 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Michael S. Elkins v. Gary McCaughtry
a petition or complaint states a claim for relief is a question of law, which we review de novo. State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5279 - 2017-09-19
a petition or complaint states a claim for relief is a question of law, which we review de novo. State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5279 - 2017-09-19
State v. Murle E. Perkins
, however, are questions of law which we review de novo. See id. ¶24 In analyzing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15777 - 2005-03-31
, however, are questions of law which we review de novo. See id. ¶24 In analyzing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15777 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tondalia K.
standard governing termination of parental rights presents a question of law this court decides de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14634 - 2005-03-31
standard governing termination of parental rights presents a question of law this court decides de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14634 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert A. Evans
professional judgment. Id. at 637. We review de novo whether performance was deficient and prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7046 - 2017-09-20
professional judgment. Id. at 637. We review de novo whether performance was deficient and prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7046 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
, which we review de novo. Id. It is the jury’s function to decide the credibility of witnesses. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35952 - 2014-09-15
, which we review de novo. Id. It is the jury’s function to decide the credibility of witnesses. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35952 - 2014-09-15
State v. Mahlick D. Ellington
issue subject to de novo review. State v. Ziebart, 2003 WI App 258, ¶16, 268 Wis. 2d 468, 480–481, 673
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20039 - 2005-12-11
issue subject to de novo review. State v. Ziebart, 2003 WI App 258, ¶16, 268 Wis. 2d 468, 480–481, 673
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20039 - 2005-12-11