Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24771 - 24780 of 29823 for des.
Search results 24771 - 24780 of 29823 for des.
Erika Eneman v. Pat Richter
of the common law doctrine of public officer immunity is a question of law which we review de novo. Kimps v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11536 - 2005-03-31
of the common law doctrine of public officer immunity is a question of law which we review de novo. Kimps v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11536 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 620 (quoting WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2019-20)). “We review summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=520081 - 2022-05-12
N.W.2d 620 (quoting WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2019-20)). “We review summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=520081 - 2022-05-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
performance was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88395 - 2014-09-15
performance was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88395 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Scott R. Jensen v. Wisconsin Elections Board
interest); see also Holder v. Hall, 512 U.S. 874 (1994); Johnson v. De Grandy, 512 U.S. 997 (1994
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16582 - 2017-09-21
interest); see also Holder v. Hall, 512 U.S. 874 (1994); Johnson v. De Grandy, 512 U.S. 997 (1994
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16582 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and prejudicial are both questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=569074 - 2022-09-22
was deficient and prejudicial are both questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=569074 - 2022-09-22
COURT OF APPEALS
for reconsideration. DISCUSSION ¶15 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using a well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131444 - 2014-12-09
for reconsideration. DISCUSSION ¶15 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using a well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131444 - 2014-12-09
State v. John Casteel
Wheat) 244, US –v- Burr, 309 US 242]. The real party of interest is not the de jure “United States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3170 - 2005-03-31
Wheat) 244, US –v- Burr, 309 US 242]. The real party of interest is not the de jure “United States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3170 - 2005-03-31
Robert Christman v. Isuzu Motors America, Inc.
. Whether a particular defense is available against a claim is generally a question of law to be reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12820 - 2005-03-31
. Whether a particular defense is available against a claim is generally a question of law to be reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12820 - 2005-03-31
Trista Auman v. School District of Stanley-Boyd
apparently been de-emphasized by the legislature. The concept of opening the property for recreational
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16415 - 2005-03-31
apparently been de-emphasized by the legislature. The concept of opening the property for recreational
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16415 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
genuine issues of material fact. ¶22 “We review an order for summary judgment de novo, using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=952066 - 2025-05-06
genuine issues of material fact. ¶22 “We review an order for summary judgment de novo, using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=952066 - 2025-05-06