Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24771 - 24780 of 26612 for marital settlement agreement/1000.

[PDF] State v. Mark A. Coleman
for August 29. ¶5 At the arraignment, pursuant to a plea agreement, Coleman pled no contest to one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4308 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
agreement, he pled no-contest as a repeat offender to three counts of injury by intoxicated use of a motor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=317600 - 2021-02-08

State v. Peter Ballos
in a consolidated trial. Jackson-Burnett, however, entered into an agreement with the State. In exchange for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14218 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to the presentence investigation report (PSI). Hill argues that, contrary to the parties’ agreement, the PSI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546491 - 2022-07-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
) and operating a motor vehicle without the owner’s consent, which resulted in a deferred prosecution agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817489 - 2024-06-26

COURT OF APPEALS
was independent of any agreement by LIRC and Gilbert. See id., ¶11. Finally, we noted, “Gilbert does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58365 - 2010-12-29

[PDF] State v. John Henry Balsewicz
the proceedings against him.” ¶8 On May 20, 1991, with the agreement of the parties, the trial court adjourned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15251 - 2017-09-21

Gary Tate v. David H. Schwarz
concurrence is in agreement with this point of law. See McKune v. Lile, 536 U.S. ___, 122 S. Ct. 2017, 2033
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16396 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
be ignored. Indeed the corporation’s stock purchase agreement recognized the parties’ “need to have equity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31314 - 2007-12-26

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 10, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Ap...
conclude that further deliberation would not result in unanimous agreement on the charge of first[-]degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87870 - 2012-10-16