Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24771 - 24780 of 63981 for records/1000.
Search results 24771 - 24780 of 63981 for records/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, she did not sexually assault the victim, nor did she have a criminal record. ¶13 Defense counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815791 - 2024-06-20
, she did not sexually assault the victim, nor did she have a criminal record. ¶13 Defense counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815791 - 2024-06-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report and independently reviewed the Record. We agree that an appeal would lack arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105186 - 2017-09-21
report and independently reviewed the Record. We agree that an appeal would lack arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105186 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Theodore L. Briggs
will be upheld if the record reflects that discretion was, in fact, exercised and the basis for the exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12087 - 2017-09-21
will be upheld if the record reflects that discretion was, in fact, exercised and the basis for the exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12087 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the no-merit report, the responses, and our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185371 - 2017-09-21
of the no-merit report, the responses, and our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185371 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
was filed. The motion and supporting affidavit are not in the record. Nos. 2006AP960 2006AP1357
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28330 - 2014-09-15
was filed. The motion and supporting affidavit are not in the record. Nos. 2006AP960 2006AP1357
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28330 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Based on our review of the record, we uphold the trial court’s order and affirm the judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37982 - 2014-09-15
. Based on our review of the record, we uphold the trial court’s order and affirm the judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37982 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and Cetnar’s response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106457 - 2014-01-06
the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and Cetnar’s response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106457 - 2014-01-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion “[f]or reasons as stated on the record,” and the second order denied his reconsideration motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=665431 - 2023-06-07
motion “[f]or reasons as stated on the record,” and the second order denied his reconsideration motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=665431 - 2023-06-07
[PDF]
State v. Robert D. Stewart
of certified copy of Stewart’s driving record at trial ¶16 Stewart argues that the State was required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3594 - 2017-09-19
of certified copy of Stewart’s driving record at trial ¶16 Stewart argues that the State was required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3594 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or on the record the amount of support that would be required by using the percentage standard, the amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83228 - 2014-09-15
or on the record the amount of support that would be required by using the percentage standard, the amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83228 - 2014-09-15