Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24781 - 24790 of 29823 for des.
Search results 24781 - 24790 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
WI APP 184
de novo review, we conclude that WIS. STAT. § 49.455 is the controlling statute in determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29761 - 2014-09-15
de novo review, we conclude that WIS. STAT. § 49.455 is the controlling statute in determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29761 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 620 (quoting WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2019-20)). “We review summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=520081 - 2022-05-12
N.W.2d 620 (quoting WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2019-20)). “We review summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=520081 - 2022-05-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
performance was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88395 - 2014-09-15
performance was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88395 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Nathaniel D. Washington
hearing, is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis.2d 303, 310, 548 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11591 - 2017-09-19
hearing, is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis.2d 303, 310, 548 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11591 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Scott R. Jensen v. Wisconsin Elections Board
interest); see also Holder v. Hall, 512 U.S. 874 (1994); Johnson v. De Grandy, 512 U.S. 997 (1994
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16582 - 2017-09-21
interest); see also Holder v. Hall, 512 U.S. 874 (1994); Johnson v. De Grandy, 512 U.S. 997 (1994
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16582 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and prejudicial are both questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=569074 - 2022-09-22
was deficient and prejudicial are both questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=569074 - 2022-09-22
[PDF]
State v. Everett W. Mosher
, whether a person is in custody for Miranda purposes is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13349 - 2017-09-21
, whether a person is in custody for Miranda purposes is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13349 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
for reconsideration. DISCUSSION ¶15 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using a well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131444 - 2014-12-09
for reconsideration. DISCUSSION ¶15 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using a well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131444 - 2014-12-09
State v. John Casteel
Wheat) 244, US –v- Burr, 309 US 242]. The real party of interest is not the de jure “United States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3170 - 2005-03-31
Wheat) 244, US –v- Burr, 309 US 242]. The real party of interest is not the de jure “United States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3170 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law, which we review de novo.” Id. No. 2022AP854-CR 7 I. Body-worn camera footage ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=786768 - 2024-04-09
of law, which we review de novo.” Id. No. 2022AP854-CR 7 I. Body-worn camera footage ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=786768 - 2024-04-09