Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24791 - 24800 of 46753 for shows.
Search results 24791 - 24800 of 46753 for shows.
CA Blank Order
. A circuit court may modify a defendant’s sentence upon a showing of a new factor. See State v. Harbor, 2011
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138080 - 2015-03-17
. A circuit court may modify a defendant’s sentence upon a showing of a new factor. See State v. Harbor, 2011
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138080 - 2015-03-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the preliminary breath screening test shall not be admissible in any action or proceeding except to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96839 - 2014-09-15
of the preliminary breath screening test shall not be admissible in any action or proceeding except to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96839 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Elton L. Eaton
. At most, the record shows Officer Wilson’s in-court, post hoc identification of Eaton as the car’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10905 - 2017-09-20
. At most, the record shows Officer Wilson’s in-court, post hoc identification of Eaton as the car’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10905 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Cody J. Vandenberg
with Reynolds and Hoppe. We conclude that Vandenberg failed to show that the evidence was newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13086 - 2017-09-21
with Reynolds and Hoppe. We conclude that Vandenberg failed to show that the evidence was newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13086 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
’ assessment, this disagreement is not enough to show the investigators intentionally or consciously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27510 - 2014-09-15
’ assessment, this disagreement is not enough to show the investigators intentionally or consciously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27510 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Timothy R. Carney v. Anthony J. Mantuano
. § 77q(a) (1981). This federal case law holds that a victim in an alleged misstatements case must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9667 - 2017-09-19
. § 77q(a) (1981). This federal case law holds that a victim in an alleged misstatements case must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9667 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
for the sentence.” Id., ¶14 (citation omitted). If the defendant makes the dual showing, the burden shifts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33708 - 2008-08-12
for the sentence.” Id., ¶14 (citation omitted). If the defendant makes the dual showing, the burden shifts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33708 - 2008-08-12
COURT OF APPEALS
for balance and put his foot down three times. The officer considered this conduct to show all four “clues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35613 - 2009-02-18
for balance and put his foot down three times. The officer considered this conduct to show all four “clues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35613 - 2009-02-18
Renee Meeks v. Michels Pipe Line Construction, Inc.
at the time of the summary judgment motion—the materials clearly show that Michels Pipe Line properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8055 - 2005-03-31
at the time of the summary judgment motion—the materials clearly show that Michels Pipe Line properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8055 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brian Swift
on a claim of newly discovered evidence, Swift must show by clear and convincing evidence that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6063 - 2005-03-31
on a claim of newly discovered evidence, Swift must show by clear and convincing evidence that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6063 - 2005-03-31