Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2481 - 2490 of 17218 for probate/1000.
Search results 2481 - 2490 of 17218 for probate/1000.
[PDF]
WI App 24
within 1000 feet of Carlin Lake, a navigable waterway, making them subject to the Vilas County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239611 - 2019-06-11
within 1000 feet of Carlin Lake, a navigable waterway, making them subject to the Vilas County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239611 - 2019-06-11
State v. David W. Oakley
] as a repeat offender, and from a postconviction order denying his challenge to his sentence and a probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16335 - 2005-03-31
] as a repeat offender, and from a postconviction order denying his challenge to his sentence and a probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16335 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
OWI Guidelines District 4 (effective June 1, 2018)
. = $21.50 $21.50 No Probation Court Support = $68.00 $68.00 Crime Lab = $13.00 $13.00 Forfeiture + Costs
/publications/fees/docs/d4owi2017-2.pdf - 2018-06-12
. = $21.50 $21.50 No Probation Court Support = $68.00 $68.00 Crime Lab = $13.00 $13.00 Forfeiture + Costs
/publications/fees/docs/d4owi2017-2.pdf - 2018-06-12
[PDF]
OWI Guidelines District 4 (effective December 1, 2018)
. = $21.50 $21.50 No Probation Court Support = $68.00 $68.00 Crime Lab = $13.00 $13.00 Forfeiture + Costs
/publications/fees/docs/d4owi2018.pdf - 2018-11-29
. = $21.50 $21.50 No Probation Court Support = $68.00 $68.00 Crime Lab = $13.00 $13.00 Forfeiture + Costs
/publications/fees/docs/d4owi2018.pdf - 2018-11-29
State v. James T. Fitzgerald
is whether Fitzgerald, as a probationer in custody under a probation hold, was a “prisoner” for purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14965 - 2005-03-31
is whether Fitzgerald, as a probationer in custody under a probation hold, was a “prisoner” for purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14965 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 973.155 (2009-10),[1] because he was serving a single term of probation as a disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66393 - 2011-06-22
. Stat. § 973.155 (2009-10),[1] because he was serving a single term of probation as a disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66393 - 2011-06-22
[PDF]
State v. James T. Fitzgerald
a probation hold, was a “prisoner” for purposes of the battery by a prisoner statute. Fitzgerald contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14965 - 2017-09-21
a probation hold, was a “prisoner” for purposes of the battery by a prisoner statute. Fitzgerald contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14965 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
),1 because he was serving a single term of probation as a disposition for Counts 1, 3, and 6. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66393 - 2014-09-15
),1 because he was serving a single term of probation as a disposition for Counts 1, 3, and 6. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66393 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
placed Klein on probation for five years, including nine months of condition time in the county jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91317 - 2013-01-08
placed Klein on probation for five years, including nine months of condition time in the county jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91317 - 2013-01-08
COURT OF APPEALS
mother or stepfather for one year as a condition of his probation. ¶2 We conclude that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82636 - 2012-05-16
mother or stepfather for one year as a condition of his probation. ¶2 We conclude that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82636 - 2012-05-16