Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24801 - 24810 of 29832 for des.
Search results 24801 - 24810 of 29832 for des.
Patrick D. Affeldt v. Yehuda Elmakias
that we review de novo. Id. Further, we will sustain a discretionary act of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12307 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. Id. Further, we will sustain a discretionary act of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12307 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
this court reviews de novo. State v. Leighton, 2000 WI App 156, ¶5, 237 Wis. 2d 709, 616 N.W.2d 126
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66110 - 2011-06-21
this court reviews de novo. State v. Leighton, 2000 WI App 156, ¶5, 237 Wis. 2d 709, 616 N.W.2d 126
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66110 - 2011-06-21
John Nierengarten v. Lutheran Social Services of Wisconsin and Upper Michigan, Inc.
. App. 1995); § 802.06(2)(b), Stats. We review a summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11186 - 2005-03-31
. App. 1995); § 802.06(2)(b), Stats. We review a summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11186 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Walter L. Merten v. Thermo Dynamic Systems, Inc.
which we review de novo. See Farrell, 151 Wis. 2d at 60. ¶23 We agree with the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14763 - 2017-09-21
which we review de novo. See Farrell, 151 Wis. 2d at 60. ¶23 We agree with the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14763 - 2017-09-21
State v. Kenneth M. Herrmann
review de novo. See State v. Turner, 136 Wis. 2d 333, 344, 401 N.W.2d 827 (1987). In my view, when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15213 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See State v. Turner, 136 Wis. 2d 333, 344, 401 N.W.2d 827 (1987). In my view, when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15213 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
William J. Evers v. Michael P. Sullivan
a claim, as well as its interpretation of a statute, present questions of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2151 - 2017-09-19
a claim, as well as its interpretation of a statute, present questions of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2151 - 2017-09-19
Robert A. Bruner, Sr. v. Heritage Companies
. We owe the trial court no deference and conduct our review de novo. See Schapiro v. Security Sav
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13288 - 2005-03-31
. We owe the trial court no deference and conduct our review de novo. See Schapiro v. Security Sav
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13288 - 2005-03-31
Amy Mathias v. St. Catherine's Hospital, Inc.
a decision on summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. See Armstrong v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10933 - 2005-03-31
a decision on summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. See Armstrong v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10933 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“Whether a particular defect is technical or fundamental is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936989 - 2025-04-02
“Whether a particular defect is technical or fundamental is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936989 - 2025-04-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a defendant was denied the right to a speedy trial is a question of law we review de novo. 4 See id., ¶10
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152325 - 2017-09-21
a defendant was denied the right to a speedy trial is a question of law we review de novo. 4 See id., ¶10
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152325 - 2017-09-21