Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24801 - 24810 of 29823 for des.

Town of Beloit v. County of Rock
summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court. Smith v. Dodgeville
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2575 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jerome Sellars
, which we review de novo. Id. Because the defendant must show both deficient performance and prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12792 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
review de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 309-10, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). ΒΆ22 Clark argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60276 - 2014-09-15

Randie Rowell v. Aldred Ash
of punitive damages should have been submitted to the jury, the appellate court reviews the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14609 - 2005-03-31

Jeffrey Loy v. Dodgeville School District
as the trial court and review de novo the grant or denial of summary judgment. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6690 - 2005-03-31

State v. Christopher Anson
review of a constitutional fact on the grounds of established historical fact, however, is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6537 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
requires the application of constitutional principles to the facts of the case, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41885 - 2009-10-06

State v. Kevin D. James
166, 172, 560 N.W.2d 246 (1997). In particular, we review de novo the constitutionality of a statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18877 - 2005-08-30

State v. Julie Ann Quinn
review de novo. See State v. Martin, 156 Wis.2d 399, 402, 456 N.W.2d 892, 894 (Ct. App. 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13629 - 2005-03-31

Russell Allen v. Wisconsin Public Service Corporation
of Lawrence & Des Rochers of St. Nazianz. 2005 WI App 40 COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6955 - 2005-03-31