Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24821 - 24830 of 27269 for ads.

[PDF] State v. James A. Schmidt
test after he submitted to the initial test.” Id., ¶51 (emphasis added). ¶20 Although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7440 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
violates the standards of due process and fair play.” (emphasis added)). Here, Judge Bailey-Rihn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=618127 - 2023-02-02

[PDF] Milwaukee County v. Edward S.
, that the individual would be a proper subject for commitment if treatment were withdrawn. (Emphasis added
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24624 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, adding that Donald “does not believe that he has a [mental] illness” that requires treatment and thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=946625 - 2025-04-30

[PDF]
with the shooting. The police officer added, “You’re facing the most serious charge, but there are a lot of other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841113 - 2024-08-22

2008 WI APP 76
Institution” resulting directly from “Funds Transfer Fraud”.[4] (Footnote added.) The College does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32486 - 2008-05-27

Kevin Kirsch v. Jeffrey P. Endicott
not work a major disruption in his environment. Id. (emphasis added). Plainly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7773 - 2005-03-31

State v. Latrina W.
; (2) failing to object to improper remarks during the guardian ad litem’s closing argument; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7150 - 2005-03-31

State v. Willie B.
; (2) failing to object to improper remarks during the guardian ad litem’s closing argument; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7199 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. (emphasis added). ¶15 No law requires an officer to use or even offer a PBT during an OWI arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32210 - 2008-03-25