Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24821 - 24830 of 83454 for case code.
Search results 24821 - 24830 of 83454 for case code.
Ronald Pierner v. Computer Resources and Technology, Inc.
of facts permitting the trial court to decide the case on the legal issues, although always subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13043 - 2005-03-31
of facts permitting the trial court to decide the case on the legal issues, although always subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13043 - 2005-03-31
State v. Sandy J. Claude
look as to whether or not there is indeed a refusal in this case, because I think
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6514 - 2005-03-31
look as to whether or not there is indeed a refusal in this case, because I think
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6514 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
McWashington had to “choose between representation or presenting the full case as [he saw] it.” McWashington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=357941 - 2021-04-20
McWashington had to “choose between representation or presenting the full case as [he saw] it.” McWashington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=357941 - 2021-04-20
[PDF]
Sheila R. McDonald v. Ardyth M. McDonald
2006 WI APP 150 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2005AP2346
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25523 - 2017-09-21
2006 WI APP 150 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2005AP2346
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25523 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
verdict of acquittal following presentation of the State’s case and should not have instructed the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54574 - 2014-09-15
verdict of acquittal following presentation of the State’s case and should not have instructed the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54574 - 2014-09-15
Hillary A.H. v. Michael J.B.
. Pursuant to this court's order of December 21, 1994, this case was submitted to the court on the expedited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8315 - 2005-03-31
. Pursuant to this court's order of December 21, 1994, this case was submitted to the court on the expedited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8315 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
was not harmless, we reverse the judgment and order and remand for a new trial. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31023 - 2014-09-15
was not harmless, we reverse the judgment and order and remand for a new trial. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31023 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and remand for a new trial. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case arises from a cocaine delivery at which Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31023 - 2007-12-03
and remand for a new trial. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case arises from a cocaine delivery at which Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31023 - 2007-12-03
[PDF]
November & December 2024 Disposition Table
& December 2024 Petitions for Review - Granted Case Number: Caption: Disposition: Date
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=898792 - 2025-01-06
& December 2024 Petitions for Review - Granted Case Number: Caption: Disposition: Date
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=898792 - 2025-01-06
[PDF]
November & December 2024 Disposition Table
& December 2024 Petitions for Review - Granted Case Number: Caption: Disposition: Date
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=898792 - 2025-01-06
& December 2024 Petitions for Review - Granted Case Number: Caption: Disposition: Date
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=898792 - 2025-01-06