Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24821 - 24830 of 30045 for de.

Dennis L. Jacobson v. American Tool Companies, Inc.
that we review de novo. See Ball v. District No. 4, Area Bd., 117 Wis.2d 529, 537, 345 N.W.2d 389, 394
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12824 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
to be clearly erroneous, but we will review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85524 - 2012-07-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of law that this court reviews de novo, and we apply the same methodology used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380622 - 2021-06-23

[PDF] Frontsheet
by the OLR arose out of Attorney Mazza's service as treasurer for the Saint Vincent de Paul Conference
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=283313 - 2020-09-01

[PDF] NOTICE
refusal to submit a lesser-included offense instruction presents a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34975 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence. See id. We then review de novo whether those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=417730 - 2021-08-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
agencies.” DeLao, 252 Wis. 2d 289, ¶21. Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236349 - 2019-03-05

Alma Bicknese, M.D. v. Thomas B. Sutula
review de novo. Kimps v. Hill, 200 Wis. 2d 1, 8, 546 N.W.2d 151 (1996). ¶10 The supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2775 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Carol Marie Bannigan v. Jeffrey Harold Johnson
of the reasonableness of a payor’s reduction in earnings is a question of law, which we generally review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15613 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Anthony D.B.
of these provisions. Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Curiel, 227
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17370 - 2017-09-21