Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24821 - 24830 of 29823 for des.

COURT OF APPEALS
of law subject to de novo review. McNeil v. Hansen, 2007 WI 56, ¶7, 300 Wis. 2d 358, 731 N.W.2d 273. ¶20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109777 - 2014-03-31

[PDF] Kenneth Ness and Susan Ness v. Digital Dial Communications, Inc.
of statutory construction, a question of law which we review de novo. J.L. Phillips & Assocs., Inc. v. E&H
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17191 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
conduct amounted to ineffective assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30607 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
carefully considered the applicable law de novo the court concludes that, based on the record, Colon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183419 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Miguel A. Rivera v. Beth T. Vandeboom
N.W.2d 852 (1957), Simon v. Van de Hey, 269 Wis. 50, 55, 68 N.W.2d 529 (1955), and Anderson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3065 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Doe v. Archdiocese of Milwaukee, 2005 WI 123, ¶19, 284 Wis. 2d 307, 700 N.W.2d 180
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=348404 - 2021-03-23

[PDF] WI APP 7
statutory or constitutional provisions is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Doss, 2008 WI 93
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156106 - 2017-09-21

2007 WI APP 181
review de novo. Kimberly Area School Dist. v. LIRC, 2005 WI App 262, ¶9, 288 Wis. 2d 542, 707 N.W.2d 872
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29515 - 2007-07-25

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
affairs of the Church anytime thereafter. ¶27 An appellate court interprets a circuit court’s order de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072071 - 2026-02-03

State v. Elbert Whitelaw
. Whether counsel's performance is prejudicial is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8630 - 2005-03-31