Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24841 - 24850 of 69120 for as he.
Search results 24841 - 24850 of 69120 for as he.
[PDF]
State v. Floyd P.
to support the jury’s verdict that he never established a substantial parental relationship with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15725 - 2017-09-21
to support the jury’s verdict that he never established a substantial parental relationship with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15725 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 71
where a defendant testifies contrary to statements he or she made within an inadmissible statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294465 - 2020-12-08
where a defendant testifies contrary to statements he or she made within an inadmissible statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294465 - 2020-12-08
State v. Paul Johnson
of conviction of party to the crime of armed robbery while masked as a repeat offender. He also appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15287 - 2005-03-31
of conviction of party to the crime of armed robbery while masked as a repeat offender. He also appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15287 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals from a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motions. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251812 - 2020-01-02
appeals from a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motions. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251812 - 2020-01-02
[PDF]
State v. Prentiss M. McKinnie
, McKinnie sought dismissal of the Waukesha county carjacking charge because he had already been convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4489 - 2017-09-19
, McKinnie sought dismissal of the Waukesha county carjacking charge because he had already been convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4489 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief. He contends that he is entitled to a new trial based upon newly discovered evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003792 - 2025-09-03
for postconviction relief. He contends that he is entitled to a new trial based upon newly discovered evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003792 - 2025-09-03
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
se, appeals from an order denying postconviction relief entered after he pled no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043630 - 2025-12-03
se, appeals from an order denying postconviction relief entered after he pled no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043630 - 2025-12-03
Rebecca J. Atwood v. Robert E. Atwood
Retirement Account in the aggregate amount of over $30,000; and that he received another, also separate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12927 - 2005-03-31
Retirement Account in the aggregate amount of over $30,000; and that he received another, also separate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12927 - 2005-03-31
Alec T. Ellsworth v. Laurie R. Ellsworth
contempt by the payment of $442,010 to his former wife, Laurie R. Ellsworth. He argues that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6252 - 2005-03-31
contempt by the payment of $442,010 to his former wife, Laurie R. Ellsworth. He argues that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6252 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
se, appeals from an order denying postconviction relief entered after he pled no contest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043630 - 2025-12-03
se, appeals from an order denying postconviction relief entered after he pled no contest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043630 - 2025-12-03