Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24841 - 24850 of 30247 for de.
Search results 24841 - 24850 of 30247 for de.
State v. Joseph A. Lombard
). Statutory interpretation is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Williams, 198 Wis. 2d 516
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16452 - 2005-03-31
). Statutory interpretation is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Williams, 198 Wis. 2d 516
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16452 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. See McNeil v. Hansen, 2007 WI 56, ¶7, 300 Wis. 2d 358, 731 N.W.2d 273 (statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=875170 - 2024-11-12
review de novo. See McNeil v. Hansen, 2007 WI 56, ¶7, 300 Wis. 2d 358, 731 N.W.2d 273 (statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=875170 - 2024-11-12
Michael Cicero v. KAS of Madison, LLC
review de novo. Fox v. Catholic Knights Ins. Soc., 2003 WI 87, ¶19, 263 Wis. 2d 207, 665 N.W.2d 181
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7300 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. Fox v. Catholic Knights Ins. Soc., 2003 WI 87, ¶19, 263 Wis. 2d 207, 665 N.W.2d 181
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7300 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 50
interpretation is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Johnson, 2007 WI 107, ¶¶27-28
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66884 - 2014-09-15
interpretation is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Johnson, 2007 WI 107, ¶¶27-28
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66884 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Grant County: Robert P. van de hey, Judge. Appeal dismissed in part; order reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92280 - 2013-01-30
of the circuit court for Grant County: Robert P. van de hey, Judge. Appeal dismissed in part; order reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92280 - 2013-01-30
Frontsheet
126, ¶5, 305 Wis. 2d 2d 71, 740 N.W.2d 125. We review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113968 - 2014-06-05
126, ¶5, 305 Wis. 2d 2d 71, 740 N.W.2d 125. We review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113968 - 2014-06-05
Frontsheet
compensation is a question of law that this court reviews de novo." E-L Enters. v. Milwaukee Metro. Sewerage
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84983 - 2012-07-16
compensation is a question of law that this court reviews de novo." E-L Enters. v. Milwaukee Metro. Sewerage
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84983 - 2012-07-16
[PDF]
County of Jefferson v. Christopher D. Renz
de novo. State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397, 405-06, 565 N.W.2d 506 (1997); Lake City Corp. v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17328 - 2017-09-21
de novo. State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397, 405-06, 565 N.W.2d 506 (1997); Lake City Corp. v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17328 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 31
for his misconduct, namely his imprisonment for 10 months, which the referee viewed as a “de facto
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977961 - 2025-07-01
for his misconduct, namely his imprisonment for 10 months, which the referee viewed as a “de facto
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977961 - 2025-07-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law decided by an agency, including statutory interpretation, our review is de novo.” DOR v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1114410 - 2026-05-05
of law decided by an agency, including statutory interpretation, our review is de novo.” DOR v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1114410 - 2026-05-05