Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24841 - 24850 of 38502 for t's.
Search results 24841 - 24850 of 38502 for t's.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, “[t]he determination of whether that new factor justifies sentence modification is committed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1005611 - 2025-09-09
, “[t]he determination of whether that new factor justifies sentence modification is committed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1005611 - 2025-09-09
Village of Elm Grove v. Tina Fleming
. ¶4 Both Officer Jeffrey Lenderman and Sergeant T. M. Mackesey arrived on the scene to assist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5138 - 2005-03-31
. ¶4 Both Officer Jeffrey Lenderman and Sergeant T. M. Mackesey arrived on the scene to assist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5138 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to preserve it. “[T]o rise to the level of a due process violation, evidence not preserved, lost or destroyed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47193 - 2010-02-23
to preserve it. “[T]o rise to the level of a due process violation, evidence not preserved, lost or destroyed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47193 - 2010-02-23
State v. Travis E. Blanks
(1973) ("[I]t is clear that the right to challenge a jury array as embodied in the jury list
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9874 - 2005-03-31
(1973) ("[I]t is clear that the right to challenge a jury array as embodied in the jury list
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9874 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by WIS. STAT. § 108.09(7)(c)1., which provides: “[T]he order of the commission is subject to review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=813719 - 2024-06-18
by WIS. STAT. § 108.09(7)(c)1., which provides: “[T]he order of the commission is subject to review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=813719 - 2024-06-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) (“[T]rial counsel was not ineffective for failing or refusing to pursue feckless arguments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705569 - 2023-09-21
) (“[T]rial counsel was not ineffective for failing or refusing to pursue feckless arguments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705569 - 2023-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
a judgment of the circuit court for Price County: DOUGLAS T. FOX, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47037 - 2014-09-15
a judgment of the circuit court for Price County: DOUGLAS T. FOX, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47037 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in response to the testimony. We conclude he could not do so. “[T]he test for whether counsel’s performance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196881 - 2017-09-21
in response to the testimony. We conclude he could not do so. “[T]he test for whether counsel’s performance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196881 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
suggesting that the circuit court should impose a disposition other than the sentence recommended: “‘[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143202 - 2015-06-22
suggesting that the circuit court should impose a disposition other than the sentence recommended: “‘[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143202 - 2015-06-22
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
). Michels further explains that “[t]here must be some connection between the factor and the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27498 - 2006-12-18
). Michels further explains that “[t]here must be some connection between the factor and the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27498 - 2006-12-18