Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24851 - 24860 of 63789 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 24851 - 24860 of 63789 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
homicide. He also appeals from the order denying his postconviction motion for relief.1 Based upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708671 - 2023-10-03
homicide. He also appeals from the order denying his postconviction motion for relief.1 Based upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708671 - 2023-10-03
[PDF]
State v. Michael F. Howard
denying his motion to withdraw his no contest plea. Howard also appeals from the denial of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5394 - 2017-09-19
denying his motion to withdraw his no contest plea. Howard also appeals from the denial of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5394 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 346.63(1)(a).[2] Troka argues that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103152 - 2013-10-16
. § 346.63(1)(a).[2] Troka argues that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103152 - 2013-10-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
homicide. He also appeals from the order denying his postconviction motion for relief.1 Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708671 - 2023-10-03
homicide. He also appeals from the order denying his postconviction motion for relief.1 Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708671 - 2023-10-03
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
from an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 postconviction motion. He claims his right to be present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28013 - 2007-02-05
from an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 postconviction motion. He claims his right to be present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28013 - 2007-02-05
[PDF]
Thomas Krueger v. Otis Elevator
Company. The judgment arose out of a motion for summary judgment filed by Otis and Hartford. Krueger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8562 - 2017-09-19
Company. The judgment arose out of a motion for summary judgment filed by Otis and Hartford. Krueger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8562 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael Daniels
his postconviction motion. Daniels claims that the trial court improperly denied his motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9988 - 2005-03-31
his postconviction motion. Daniels claims that the trial court improperly denied his motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9988 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
is whether there was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s guilty verdict, and to deny Martin’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33908 - 2014-09-15
is whether there was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s guilty verdict, and to deny Martin’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33908 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
granting default judgment was filed on April 23. ¶6 On May 3, 2010, Dezotell filed a motion for relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72951 - 2014-09-15
granting default judgment was filed on April 23. ¶6 On May 3, 2010, Dezotell filed a motion for relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72951 - 2014-09-15
Thomas R. Leske v. John A. Leske
submitted in support of the defendants' motion for summary judgment. The defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7719 - 2005-03-31
submitted in support of the defendants' motion for summary judgment. The defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7719 - 2005-03-31