Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24861 - 24870 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
Search results 24861 - 24870 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032425 - 2025-11-05
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032425 - 2025-11-05
[PDF]
Melvin R. Jones v. Jerome R. Poole
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-1430 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12492 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-1430 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12492 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Dunn County v. Kelly D.
and continued to preside over the cases. In the alternative, she argues that the ultimate disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3128 - 2017-09-19
and continued to preside over the cases. In the alternative, she argues that the ultimate disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3128 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
cases involve different aspects of a reopened divorce judgment. In this appeal, Ronald Lundt appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30228 - 2014-09-15
cases involve different aspects of a reopened divorce judgment. In this appeal, Ronald Lundt appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30228 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See No. 2024AP1356-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039532 - 2025-11-19
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See No. 2024AP1356-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039532 - 2025-11-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in Schaffrath v. Keefe, Marquette County Case No. 2009-FA-44.” The circuit court dismissed that claim as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155571 - 2017-09-21
in Schaffrath v. Keefe, Marquette County Case No. 2009-FA-44.” The circuit court dismissed that claim as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155571 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
cites case law where the issue was whether the sentence was unduly harsh. That issue is not the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157901 - 2017-09-21
cites case law where the issue was whether the sentence was unduly harsh. That issue is not the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157901 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Dunn County v. Kelly D.
and continued to preside over the cases. In the alternative, she argues that the ultimate disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3127 - 2017-09-19
and continued to preside over the cases. In the alternative, she argues that the ultimate disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3127 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
no contest pleas, leaving Starck unaware of weaknesses in the State’s case. We affirm the judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102416 - 2013-09-30
no contest pleas, leaving Starck unaware of weaknesses in the State’s case. We affirm the judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102416 - 2013-09-30
[PDF]
State v. Derrick Emerson
of this case, we set out the applicable law. A trial court’s decision whether to allow withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5634 - 2017-09-19
of this case, we set out the applicable law. A trial court’s decision whether to allow withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5634 - 2017-09-19