Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24861 - 24870 of 30247 for de.
Search results 24861 - 24870 of 30247 for de.
Frontsheet
review determinations of these questions de novo. State v. McGuire, 2010 WI 91, ¶26, 328 Wis. 2d 289
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84833 - 2012-07-11
review determinations of these questions de novo. State v. McGuire, 2010 WI 91, ¶26, 328 Wis. 2d 289
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84833 - 2012-07-11
[PDF]
Frontsheet
of law that we review de novo. State v. Stuart (Stuart I), 2003 WI 73, ¶20, 262 Wis. 2d 620, 664 N.W
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347890 - 2021-05-28
of law that we review de novo. State v. Stuart (Stuart I), 2003 WI 73, ¶20, 262 Wis. 2d 620, 664 N.W
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347890 - 2021-05-28
[PDF]
Frontsheet
of law on a de novo basis. Id. We determine the appropriate level of discipline given the particular
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113968 - 2017-09-21
of law on a de novo basis. Id. We determine the appropriate level of discipline given the particular
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113968 - 2017-09-21
State v. Gabriel Derango
of a trial court’s bindover decision is de novo. See State v. Moats, 156 Wis.2d 74, 84, 457 N.W.2d 299, 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13705 - 2005-03-31
of a trial court’s bindover decision is de novo. See State v. Moats, 156 Wis.2d 74, 84, 457 N.W.2d 299, 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13705 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James H. Oswald
. The trial court’s decision whether the waiver was valid is reviewed de novo because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12412 - 2017-09-21
. The trial court’s decision whether the waiver was valid is reviewed de novo because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12412 - 2017-09-21
Linda Margaret Salveson v. Douglas County
to the discretion of the circuit court. Fleming, 181 Wis. 2d at 558. A reviewing court determines de novo, however
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17499 - 2005-03-31
to the discretion of the circuit court. Fleming, 181 Wis. 2d at 558. A reviewing court determines de novo, however
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17499 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 36
jurisdiction is a question of law that we review de novo. See id., ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260896 - 2020-07-09
jurisdiction is a question of law that we review de novo. See id., ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260896 - 2020-07-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
be granted is an issue of law that is subject to de novo review on appeal. Id., ¶17. ¶23 The issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=703336 - 2023-09-14
be granted is an issue of law that is subject to de novo review on appeal. Id., ¶17. ¶23 The issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=703336 - 2023-09-14
State v. Robert C. Deilke
constitutes a material and substantial breach of a plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16683 - 2005-03-31
constitutes a material and substantial breach of a plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16683 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Leanne M. Abbas v. Bradley J. Palmersheim
We disagree. ¶17 The question before us is one of statutory interpretation, which we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6472 - 2017-09-19
We disagree. ¶17 The question before us is one of statutory interpretation, which we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6472 - 2017-09-19