Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24871 - 24880 of 91512 for 1.
Search results 24871 - 24880 of 91512 for 1.
Washington County v. Richard E. Hupfer
contrary to § 346.63(1)(b), Stats.[1] Hupfer now appeals, claiming that the arresting officer lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11665 - 2005-03-31
contrary to § 346.63(1)(b), Stats.[1] Hupfer now appeals, claiming that the arresting officer lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11665 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Randy A. Weishar
of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: CARL ASHLEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 FINE, J. Randy A. Weishar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3774 - 2017-09-19
of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: CARL ASHLEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 FINE, J. Randy A. Weishar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3774 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Curley, P.J., Fine and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Maximilliano Mejia, pro se, appeals an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116919 - 2017-09-21
Curley, P.J., Fine and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Maximilliano Mejia, pro se, appeals an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116919 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
. Rule 809.17(1) (2011-12).[1] Upon review of those memoranda and the record, we affirm the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101949 - 2013-09-17
. Rule 809.17(1) (2011-12).[1] Upon review of those memoranda and the record, we affirm the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101949 - 2013-09-17
State v. John D. Mascaretti
: robert a. haase, Judge. Affirmed. Before Nettesheim, Anderson and Snyder, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15614 - 2005-03-31
: robert a. haase, Judge. Affirmed. Before Nettesheim, Anderson and Snyder, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15614 - 2005-03-31
James D. Fox v. Jeffrey P. Endicott
). On certiorari, the reviewing court is limited to determining: (1) whether the [committee] kept within its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10081 - 2005-03-31
). On certiorari, the reviewing court is limited to determining: (1) whether the [committee] kept within its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10081 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Howard A. Perkins, pro se, appeals an order denying his petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96182 - 2013-05-06
and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Howard A. Perkins, pro se, appeals an order denying his petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96182 - 2013-05-06
[PDF]
State v. Shawn R. Coleman
controlling his anger.1 The investigator concluded that Coleman "feels fine now and feelings of depression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8679 - 2017-09-19
controlling his anger.1 The investigator concluded that Coleman "feels fine now and feelings of depression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8679 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1 We summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114776 - 2017-09-21
for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1 We summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114776 - 2017-09-21
Nanci Brisbane v. Peter J. Vallecillo
, Roggensack and Deininger, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Peter Vallecillo challenges the circuit court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4417 - 2005-03-31
, Roggensack and Deininger, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Peter Vallecillo challenges the circuit court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4417 - 2005-03-31