Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24881 - 24890 of 39128 for c's.
Search results 24881 - 24890 of 39128 for c's.
[PDF]
Rudy Kopecky v. Nancy Lamar
: (a) The time and labor required. (b) The experience and knowledge of the attorney. (c) The complexity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8389 - 2017-09-19
: (a) The time and labor required. (b) The experience and knowledge of the attorney. (c) The complexity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8389 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Eureka Scruggs
. She received twenty years. The trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion here. C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11998 - 2017-09-21
. She received twenty years. The trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion here. C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11998 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
)-(c). The court noted that the case proceeded to a bench trial, rather than a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980070 - 2025-07-09
)-(c). The court noted that the case proceeded to a bench trial, rather than a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980070 - 2025-07-09
County of Buffalo v. Bonnie L. K.
with the construction of a statute, whether the 14-day time limit in § 51.20(7)(c), Stats., referred to calendar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14124 - 2005-03-31
with the construction of a statute, whether the 14-day time limit in § 51.20(7)(c), Stats., referred to calendar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14124 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
or medical incapacity. (c) The misconduct justifies substantially different discipline in this state. (4
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49434 - 2010-04-27
or medical incapacity. (c) The misconduct justifies substantially different discipline in this state. (4
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49434 - 2010-04-27
State v. Tory L. Rachel
. It states that “[c]hapters 801 to 847 govern procedure and practice in circuit courts of this state in all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14282 - 2005-03-31
. It states that “[c]hapters 801 to 847 govern procedure and practice in circuit courts of this state in all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14282 - 2005-03-31
State v. Craig A. Zempel
)(b)4, Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), Stats. [2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14285 - 2005-03-31
)(b)4, Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), Stats. [2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14285 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
: PETER C. DILTZ, Judge. Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part; order reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40268 - 2009-08-31
: PETER C. DILTZ, Judge. Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part; order reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40268 - 2009-08-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: ELSA C. LAMELAS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Fine, Curley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29701 - 2007-07-16
of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: ELSA C. LAMELAS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Fine, Curley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29701 - 2007-07-16
State v. Charles R. Seibel
)(b)(4). [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (2001-02
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6857 - 2005-03-31
)(b)(4). [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (2001-02
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6857 - 2005-03-31