Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24891 - 24900 of 29721 for des.

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Arik J. Guenther
of fact are affirmed unless clearly erroneous; but conclusions of law are reviewed on a de novo basis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19061 - 2005-07-18

Town of Beloit v. County of Rock
summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court. Smith v. Dodgeville
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2575 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. John Casteel
is not the de jure “United States of America” or “State,” but the Bank and “The Fund.” [22USC § 286 et seq
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3170 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of law we review de novo. Id. We resolve all doubts about whether a claim is frivolous in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186590 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 48
of law—de novo.” Tetra Tech EC, Inc. v. DOR, 2018 WI 75, ¶84, 382 Wis. 2d 496, 914 N.W.2d 21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215775 - 2018-09-07

[PDF] Trista Auman v. School District of Stanley-Boyd
the property has apparently been de-emphasized by the legislature. The concept of opening the property
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16415 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jeremy D. Russ
communicate.” ¶7 Which party bears the burden of proof presents a question of law for our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20692 - 2006-01-24

[PDF] WI APP 148
received due process is a question of law that we review de novo. Wright, 210 Wis. 2d at 296
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55134 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Derrick C. Montriel
a defendant is entitled to sentence credit pursuant to § 973.155 is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7289 - 2017-09-20

2010 WI APP 117
applies a de novo standard of review. See id. ¶10 We see the initial question as being whether Grand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52163 - 2010-08-24