Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24891 - 24900 of 29721 for des.
Search results 24891 - 24900 of 29721 for des.
State v. Robert A. Evans
. Id. at 637. We review de novo whether performance was deficient and prejudiced the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7046 - 2005-03-31
. Id. at 637. We review de novo whether performance was deficient and prejudiced the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7046 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
facts which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=394037 - 2021-07-20
facts which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=394037 - 2021-07-20
[PDF]
Karen R. Yocherer v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
that we decide de novo. Magyar v. Physicians Ins. Co., 2001 WI 41, ¶8, 242 Wis. 2d 491, 625 N.W.2d 291
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16373 - 2017-09-21
that we decide de novo. Magyar v. Physicians Ins. Co., 2001 WI 41, ¶8, 242 Wis. 2d 491, 625 N.W.2d 291
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16373 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Miguel A. Rivera v. Beth T. Vandeboom
N.W.2d 852 (1957), Simon v. Van de Hey, 269 Wis. 50, 55, 68 N.W.2d 529 (1955), and Anderson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3065 - 2017-09-19
N.W.2d 852 (1957), Simon v. Van de Hey, 269 Wis. 50, 55, 68 N.W.2d 529 (1955), and Anderson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3065 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 72
is “a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Turnpaugh, 2007 WI App 222, ¶ 2, 305 Wis. 2d 722
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199515 - 2017-12-12
is “a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Turnpaugh, 2007 WI App 222, ¶ 2, 305 Wis. 2d 722
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199515 - 2017-12-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and prejudicial are both questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=569074 - 2022-09-22
was deficient and prejudicial are both questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=569074 - 2022-09-22
[PDF]
State v. Robert V. Horn
reviews de novo. State v. Borrell, 167 Wis. 2d 749, 762, 482 N.W.2d 883 (1992). ¶8 When a party
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17307 - 2017-09-21
reviews de novo. State v. Borrell, 167 Wis. 2d 749, 762, 482 N.W.2d 883 (1992). ¶8 When a party
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17307 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Federal Insurance Company v. Grunau Project Development, Inc.
as they are all interrelated. ¶13 The standard of review of a motion granting summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25384 - 2017-09-21
as they are all interrelated. ¶13 The standard of review of a motion granting summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25384 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
erroneous, but we will review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251534 - 2019-12-18
erroneous, but we will review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251534 - 2019-12-18
[PDF]
WI APP 148
, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104462 - 2017-09-21
, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104462 - 2017-09-21