Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2491 - 2500 of 17242 for probate/1000.
Search results 2491 - 2500 of 17242 for probate/1000.
Robert Garel v. Michael Sullivan
of his probation and parole revocations.[1] Garel was assigned to the Department of Intensive Sanctions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10515 - 2005-03-31
of his probation and parole revocations.[1] Garel was assigned to the Department of Intensive Sanctions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10515 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert Garel v. Michael Sullivan
for certiorari review of his probation and parole revocations.1 Garel was assigned to the Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10515 - 2017-09-20
for certiorari review of his probation and parole revocations.1 Garel was assigned to the Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10515 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. David W. Oakley
such circumstances, the probation condition is not overbroad. Furthermore, the probation condition is reasonably
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17588 - 2017-09-21
such circumstances, the probation condition is not overbroad. Furthermore, the probation condition is reasonably
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17588 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Lillian Dallman v. Theodore Pyke, Jr.
, Theodore Pyke, Jr., filed with the Probate Branch of the Marathon County Circuit Court a claim against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10484 - 2017-09-20
, Theodore Pyke, Jr., filed with the Probate Branch of the Marathon County Circuit Court a claim against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10484 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
from judgments sentencing her after revocation of her probation for operating while intoxicated (sixth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96373 - 2013-05-07
from judgments sentencing her after revocation of her probation for operating while intoxicated (sixth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96373 - 2013-05-07
[PDF]
Albert A. Tadych v. Waukesha County
., 166 Wis. 2d 1000, 1006, 480 N.W.2d 836 (Ct. App. 1992). “Excusable neglect is that which might have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15668 - 2017-09-21
., 166 Wis. 2d 1000, 1006, 480 N.W.2d 836 (Ct. App. 1992). “Excusable neglect is that which might have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15668 - 2017-09-21
State v. Vernon Dansand
(1)(a) and (3)(b), Stats. (intentional carrying away of property valued between $1000 and $2500
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13766 - 2005-03-31
(1)(a) and (3)(b), Stats. (intentional carrying away of property valued between $1000 and $2500
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13766 - 2005-03-31
Michael S. Elkins v. Shawn B. Schneider
.). These procedures are used in the rare and exceptional case, frequency of which is probably no more than 1 in 1000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4820 - 2005-03-31
.). These procedures are used in the rare and exceptional case, frequency of which is probably no more than 1 in 1000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4820 - 2005-03-31
Michael S. Elkins v. Shawn B. Schneider
.). These procedures are used in the rare and exceptional case, frequency of which is probably no more than 1 in 1000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4819 - 2005-03-31
.). These procedures are used in the rare and exceptional case, frequency of which is probably no more than 1 in 1000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4819 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the correct equalized tax rate is $8.9010 per $1000 of equalized valuation. The record before this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45887 - 2014-09-15
that the correct equalized tax rate is $8.9010 per $1000 of equalized valuation. The record before this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45887 - 2014-09-15