Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24901 - 24910 of 29823 for des.

State v. James F. Brienzo
that we review de novo. See State v. Jensen, 2000 WI 84, ¶12, 236 Wis. 2d 521, 613 N.W.2d 170
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3986 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jerome Sellars
performance was deficient and whether the defendant was prejudiced are questions of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12792 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Ellis H.
. STAT. § 938.355(6)(d). Statutory interpretation is considered de novo. State v. Aaron D., 214 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7080 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] WI App 5
court’s application of constitutional principles to the findings of fact de novo.” State v. Smiter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204933 - 2018-08-23

[PDF] Dennis L. Jacobson v. American Tool Companies, Inc.
the application of law to the facts of the case. It therefore presents a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12824 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Willie D. Engram
that was prejudicial to the defendant is a constitutional issue that presents a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19892 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law subject to de novo review. McNeil v. Hansen, 2007 WI 56, ¶7, 300 Wis. 2d 358, 731 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109777 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. State v. Magett, 2014 WI 67, ¶29, 355 Wis. 2d 617, 850 N.W.2d 42. ¶40 Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165172 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 36
to undisputed facts is a question of law for our de novo review. See Knight v. Milwaukee County, 2002 WI 27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28134 - 2014-09-15

Jonathan Snapp v. Jessie Jean-Claude, M.D.
judgment is a question of law that we consider de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20970 - 2006-01-17