Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24901 - 24910 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 24901 - 24910 of 58492 for speedy trial.
State v. James J. Kempinski
by the presentencing plea withdrawal standard of a “fair and just reason” for withdrawing a plea. Former trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2416 - 2005-03-31
by the presentencing plea withdrawal standard of a “fair and just reason” for withdrawing a plea. Former trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2416 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel for not filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105183 - 2017-09-21
denying his postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel for not filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105183 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Yeng Vang
motion to suppress statements was denied after the trial court heard testimony from the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5993 - 2017-09-19
motion to suppress statements was denied after the trial court heard testimony from the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5993 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a suppression motion on the basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112453 - 2017-09-21
report that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a suppression motion on the basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112453 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for the reasons set forth in his pro se postconviction motion.3 Zamora argued in that motion that his trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=280998 - 2020-08-26
for the reasons set forth in his pro se postconviction motion.3 Zamora argued in that motion that his trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=280998 - 2020-08-26
COURT OF APPEALS
is whether the record supports the trial court’s determination that Van Ert would be able to pay $100,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30744 - 2007-10-31
is whether the record supports the trial court’s determination that Van Ert would be able to pay $100,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30744 - 2007-10-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel J. Bohringer
of the trial court revoking his operating privileges for a period of one year based upon his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5832 - 2017-09-19
of the trial court revoking his operating privileges for a period of one year based upon his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5832 - 2017-09-19
State v. Lee D. Worby
which we review de novo and without deference to the trial court. There is a presumption that a judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2917 - 2005-03-31
which we review de novo and without deference to the trial court. There is a presumption that a judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2917 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
motion. For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that the trial court properly denied Evans’ second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55527 - 2010-10-13
motion. For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that the trial court properly denied Evans’ second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55527 - 2010-10-13
R.M. Iverson v. City of River Falls
a judgment dismissing his claim of excessive property tax assessment. He argues (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8997 - 2005-03-31
a judgment dismissing his claim of excessive property tax assessment. He argues (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8997 - 2005-03-31