Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24911 - 24920 of 91101 for civil+disposition+summary+county.
Search results 24911 - 24920 of 91101 for civil+disposition+summary+county.
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92654 - 2013-02-12
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92654 - 2013-02-12
CA Blank Order
for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm. On May 10, 2011, the parties
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97559 - 2013-06-04
for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm. On May 10, 2011, the parties
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97559 - 2013-06-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this summary disposition order will not be published and may not be cited except
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192147 - 2017-09-21
. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this summary disposition order will not be published and may not be cited except
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192147 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185462 - 2017-09-21
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185462 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21. Because Olmstead has failed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109035 - 2012-02-18
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21. Because Olmstead has failed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109035 - 2012-02-18
CA Blank Order
for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] In late 2001, Wozny was charged with nine
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104017 - 2013-11-12
for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] In late 2001, Wozny was charged with nine
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104017 - 2013-11-12
LeRoy M. Strenke v. Levi Hogner
on Briefs: Oral Argument: October 28, 2004 Source of Appeal: Court: Circuit County
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16816 - 2005-03-31
on Briefs: Oral Argument: October 28, 2004 Source of Appeal: Court: Circuit County
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16816 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
LeRoy M. Strenke v. Levi Hogner
OF APPEAL: COURT: Circuit COUNTY: Barron JUDGE: Frederick A. Henderson JUSTICES
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16816 - 2017-09-21
OF APPEAL: COURT: Circuit COUNTY: Barron JUDGE: Frederick A. Henderson JUSTICES
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16816 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Rupena's, Inc. v. City of West Allis
, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: DAVID
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2271 - 2017-09-19
, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: DAVID
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2271 - 2017-09-19
Rupena's, Inc. v. City of West Allis
a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: david A. hansher, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2271 - 2005-03-31
a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: david A. hansher, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2271 - 2005-03-31