Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24911 - 24920 of 83380 for simple case search.

[PDF] State v. Anthony J. Dentici
) (1997–98), which provided for six-person juries in misdemeanor cases, might be held unconstitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16070 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Hugo Bramschreiber Asphalt Co., Inc. v. Midwest Amusement Park, LLC
to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2003-04 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2006AP1205 2 case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26525 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS
2012 COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92875 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 23, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Ap...
provided to law enforcement in a separate case was a new factor warranting reduction of his sentence. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91922 - 2013-01-22

State v. Manuel Sergio Martinez
in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), and could not be used by the State in its case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18201 - 2005-05-17

[PDF] CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217472 - 2018-08-15

[PDF] City of Appleton v. Jennifer L. Drephal
of an intoxicant.1 A jury found Drephal guilty of the violation, but the circuit court dismissed the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15701 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] David T. Lass v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
did not err in its exercise of discretion in dismissing the case, we affirm.1 BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13627 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242870 - 2019-06-25

[PDF] State v. Manuel Sergio Martinez
in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), and could not be used by the State in its case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18201 - 2017-09-21