Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24921 - 24930 of 91101 for civil+disposition+summary+county.
Search results 24921 - 24930 of 91101 for civil+disposition+summary+county.
WI App 22 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP398 Complete Title o...
Central first submits that the trial court erred in denying each of its dispositive motions—for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76400 - 2012-02-28
Central first submits that the trial court erred in denying each of its dispositive motions—for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76400 - 2012-02-28
[PDF]
WI APP 22
dispositive motions—for summary judgment, for a directed verdict, for judgment notwithstanding the verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76400 - 2014-09-15
dispositive motions—for summary judgment, for a directed verdict, for judgment notwithstanding the verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76400 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 89
of the circuit court for Langlade County: FRED W. KAWALSKI and THOMAS G. GROVER, Judges. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180505 - 2017-09-21
of the circuit court for Langlade County: FRED W. KAWALSKI and THOMAS G. GROVER, Judges. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180505 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
brought a motion for summary judgment based on the County’s failure to provide Monique with a CHIPS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86109 - 2014-09-15
brought a motion for summary judgment based on the County’s failure to provide Monique with a CHIPS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86109 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
contends that if counsel had brought a motion for summary judgment based on the County’s failure to provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86109 - 2012-08-14
contends that if counsel had brought a motion for summary judgment based on the County’s failure to provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86109 - 2012-08-14
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
, Defendant-Respondent. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27497 - 2006-12-18
, Defendant-Respondent. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27497 - 2006-12-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51295 - 2014-09-15
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51295 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
TO ISAIAH H., A PERSON UNDER THE AGE OF 18: DANE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74929 - 2014-09-15
TO ISAIAH H., A PERSON UNDER THE AGE OF 18: DANE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74929 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the age of 18: Dane County Department of Human Services, Petitioner-Respondent, v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74929 - 2011-12-07
the age of 18: Dane County Department of Human Services, Petitioner-Respondent, v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74929 - 2011-12-07
COURT OF APPEALS
County of Jefferson, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jodi L. Gromowski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51295 - 2010-06-23
County of Jefferson, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jodi L. Gromowski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51295 - 2010-06-23