Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24921 - 24930 of 30247 for de.
Search results 24921 - 24930 of 30247 for de.
[PDF]
Supreme Court rule petition 20-05 memo
-present Hon. Robert Van De Hey Grant County Circuit Court Former Chair (2/2017-5/2018) 2/2017
/supreme/docs/2005memo.pdf - 2020-10-15
-present Hon. Robert Van De Hey Grant County Circuit Court Former Chair (2/2017-5/2018) 2/2017
/supreme/docs/2005memo.pdf - 2020-10-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
a referee's No. 2022AP41-D 14 conclusions of law de novo. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756511 - 2024-01-26
a referee's No. 2022AP41-D 14 conclusions of law de novo. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756511 - 2024-01-26
[PDF]
WI App 52
. 2d 296, 953 N.W.2d 337. Even with this de novo review, we may “benefit from the analys[i]s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=975474 - 2025-09-18
. 2d 296, 953 N.W.2d 337. Even with this de novo review, we may “benefit from the analys[i]s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=975474 - 2025-09-18
[PDF]
Trista Auman v. School District of Stanley-Boyd
the property has apparently been de-emphasized by the legislature. The concept of opening the property
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16415 - 2017-09-21
the property has apparently been de-emphasized by the legislature. The concept of opening the property
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16415 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
under a certain set of facts” is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Vanbeek, 2009 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078662 - 2026-02-17
under a certain set of facts” is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Vanbeek, 2009 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078662 - 2026-02-17
[PDF]
Mark A. Ramsden v. Farm Credit Services of North Central Wisconsin ACA
of law, which we review de novo. Heinritz v. Lawrence Univ., 194 Wis.2d 606, 610, 535 N.W.2d 81, 83
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13054 - 2017-09-21
of law, which we review de novo. Heinritz v. Lawrence Univ., 194 Wis.2d 606, 610, 535 N.W.2d 81, 83
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13054 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“Whether a particular defect is technical or fundamental is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936989 - 2025-04-02
“Whether a particular defect is technical or fundamental is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936989 - 2025-04-02
State v. Tony M. Smith
determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8414 - 2005-03-31
determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8414 - 2005-03-31
Robert A. Bruner, Sr. v. Heritage Companies
. We owe the trial court no deference and conduct our review de novo. See Schapiro v. Security Sav
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13288 - 2005-03-31
. We owe the trial court no deference and conduct our review de novo. See Schapiro v. Security Sav
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13288 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ralph Braunreiter v. City of Milwaukee
after a de novo hearing under section 68.11, Wis. Stats, where findings of fact are made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6046 - 2017-09-19
after a de novo hearing under section 68.11, Wis. Stats, where findings of fact are made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6046 - 2017-09-19