Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24931 - 24940 of 29996 for de.
Search results 24931 - 24940 of 29996 for de.
State v. Nathaniel D. Washington
to relief, and therefore justify an evidentiary hearing, is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11591 - 2005-03-31
to relief, and therefore justify an evidentiary hearing, is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11591 - 2005-03-31
WI App 129 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP1898-CR Complete Ti...
review the circuit court’s application of constitutional principles to the findings of fact de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70319 - 2013-04-23
review the circuit court’s application of constitutional principles to the findings of fact de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70319 - 2013-04-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“Whether a particular defect is technical or fundamental is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936989 - 2025-04-02
“Whether a particular defect is technical or fundamental is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936989 - 2025-04-02
State v. Scott Leason Badker
of fact satisfy a constitutional standard is a question of law that we review de novo. Dagnall, 2000 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16191 - 2005-03-31
of fact satisfy a constitutional standard is a question of law that we review de novo. Dagnall, 2000 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16191 - 2005-03-31
State v. Curtis Brewer
prejudiced the defense are questions of law which we review de novo. See id. at 25, 496 N.W.2d at 104-05
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7906 - 2005-03-31
prejudiced the defense are questions of law which we review de novo. See id. at 25, 496 N.W.2d at 104-05
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7906 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jeffrey Loy v. Dodgeville School District
apply the same methodology as the trial court and review de novo the grant or denial of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6690 - 2017-09-20
apply the same methodology as the trial court and review de novo the grant or denial of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6690 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
be excluded). ¶13 We review de novo whether the State violated its discovery obligations and, if so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193387 - 2017-09-21
be excluded). ¶13 We review de novo whether the State violated its discovery obligations and, if so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193387 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 24
conclusions of law on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Carroll, 2001 WI 130
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35946 - 2014-09-15
conclusions of law on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Carroll, 2001 WI 130
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35946 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2 Standard of Review ¶4 We review a grant or denial of summary judgment de novo. Mach v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193285 - 2017-09-21
. 2 Standard of Review ¶4 We review a grant or denial of summary judgment de novo. Mach v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193285 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
and dangerous to the officer or others—is a question of constitutional law” that we decide de novo. Id., ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26860 - 2006-10-18
and dangerous to the officer or others—is a question of constitutional law” that we decide de novo. Id., ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26860 - 2006-10-18