Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24951 - 24960 of 69399 for as he.
Search results 24951 - 24960 of 69399 for as he.
[PDF]
State v. Zena H.
to support the jury’s verdict that he never established a substantial parental relationship with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15743 - 2017-09-21
to support the jury’s verdict that he never established a substantial parental relationship with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15743 - 2017-09-21
State v. Floyd P.
it dismissed a venireman for cause; (2) there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15725 - 2005-03-31
it dismissed a venireman for cause; (2) there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15725 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
se, appeals from an order denying postconviction relief entered after he pled no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043630 - 2025-12-03
se, appeals from an order denying postconviction relief entered after he pled no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043630 - 2025-12-03
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
se, appeals from an order denying postconviction relief entered after he pled no contest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043630 - 2025-12-03
se, appeals from an order denying postconviction relief entered after he pled no contest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043630 - 2025-12-03
[PDF]
State v. Prentiss M. McKinnie
, McKinnie sought dismissal of the Waukesha county carjacking charge because he had already been convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4489 - 2017-09-19
, McKinnie sought dismissal of the Waukesha county carjacking charge because he had already been convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4489 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
26, 2017 order. Because he raises no cognizable argument regarding these matters on appeal, any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279288 - 2020-08-18
26, 2017 order. Because he raises no cognizable argument regarding these matters on appeal, any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279288 - 2020-08-18
[PDF]
Alec T. Ellsworth v. Laurie R. Ellsworth
Ellsworth. He argues that he did not violate a clear mandate of the parties’ settlement agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6252 - 2017-09-19
Ellsworth. He argues that he did not violate a clear mandate of the parties’ settlement agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6252 - 2017-09-19
State v. James E. Ganey
of four counts of fourth degree sexual assault, contrary to § 940.225(3m), Stats. He claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11984 - 2005-03-31
of four counts of fourth degree sexual assault, contrary to § 940.225(3m), Stats. He claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11984 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
se, appeals from an order denying postconviction relief entered after he pled no contest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050945 - 2025-12-17
se, appeals from an order denying postconviction relief entered after he pled no contest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050945 - 2025-12-17
Richard Sielaff v. Milwaukee County
employment with the Milwaukee County Sheriff's Department as a deputy sheriff I. In 1980, he was promoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8566 - 2005-03-31
employment with the Milwaukee County Sheriff's Department as a deputy sheriff I. In 1980, he was promoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8566 - 2005-03-31

